I think more for past safety reasons. Leif did quite a bit of work around
the 5.x time frame to make the release logic more forgiving.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Walt Karas wrote:
> In TSHandleMLocRelease(), in the one case where this function is not a
> do-nothing, the "parent" is validat
In TSHandleMLocRelease(), in the one case where this function is not a
do-nothing, the "parent" is validated, but does not seem to be
actually used. Is the parent relationship needed for some
future-safety reason?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Alan Carroll
wrote:
> I think it's a type pun of
I think it's a type pun of one of a variety of different classes. Type
punning makes it less likely the user of the API will pass the wrong type
to an API call, although given the apparent variety of things passed back
as TSMLoc, I'm not sure how good a job it's doing of that. Although
definitely v
