Re: Proposed API: TSHttpTxnCacheabilitySet / TSHttpTxnCacheabilityGet

2015-04-26 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Apr 12, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Alan M. Carroll wrote: > > This is in response to discussions on IRC and TS-3426. This would replace all > of the current API functions to control cacheability. > > TSHttpTxnCacheablility > == > > Synopsis > > > `#include ` > >

Re: Proposed API: TSHttpTxnCacheabilitySet / TSHttpTxnCacheabilityGet

2015-04-24 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Apr 24, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Vasicek, John wrote: > > I would like to see something that supports the ability to ³delete all > objects for a URI² - all objects/alternate objects for a URI, including > Content-Type, Content-Encoding, and the Vary header. That's the way it works already. I

Re: Proposed API: TSHttpTxnCacheabilitySet / TSHttpTxnCacheabilityGet

2015-04-24 Thread Vasicek, John
I would like to see something that supports the ability to ³delete all objects for a URI² - all objects/alternate objects for a URI, including Content-Type, Content-Encoding, and the Vary header. John Paul On 4/12/15, 4:48 PM, "Sudheer Vinukonda" wrote: >Agree with Leif on clarifying explicitly

Re: Proposed API: TSHttpTxnCacheabilitySet / TSHttpTxnCacheabilityGet

2015-04-12 Thread Sudheer Vinukonda
Agree with Leif on clarifying explicitly the interaction of the new API with  TSHttpTxnIsCacheable(). More specifically, should the new API also *override* the global setting {{proxy.config.http.cache.http}} when it's disabled? The current behavior only allows to override {{proxy.config.http.cach

Re: Proposed API: TSHttpTxnCacheabilitySet / TSHttpTxnCacheabilityGet

2015-04-12 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Apr 12, 2015, at 5:28 PM, Alan M. Carroll wrote: > > This is in response to discussions on IRC and TS-3426. This would replace all > of the current API functions to control cache ability. It’s in the Jira, but to be explicit, these are the three APIs that this new API would deprecate: