+1
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:07 AM Bryan Call wrote:
> +1
>
> -Bryan
>
>
>
> > On Nov 14, 2023, at 12:24 PM, Masakazu Kitajo wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > At the weekly ATS 10 meeting, the participants agreed to bump the minimum
> > OpenSSL version we support on ATS 10, and it's going to be 1.
+1
-Bryan
> On Nov 14, 2023, at 12:24 PM, Masakazu Kitajo wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> At the weekly ATS 10 meeting, the participants agreed to bump the minimum
> OpenSSL version we support on ATS 10, and it's going to be 1.1.1. I'm
> sending this email to make that an official decision.
>
> The
On Sep 24, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Susan Hinrichs
wrote:
> Noticed something in the RHEL5 build while tracking down build errors. For
> RHEL5 master build TS_USE_TLS_SNI is not defined which means the function
> SSL_CTX_set_tlsext_servername_callback is not set in the version of openssl
> used by
The function SSL_set_SSL_CTX is missing in openssl 0.9.7 and also not
accessible in the RHEL5 builds.
On 9/24/2014 10:40 AM, Susan Hinrichs wrote:
Noticed something in the RHEL5 build while tracking down build
errors. For RHEL5 master build TS_USE_TLS_SNI is not defined which
means the funct
Noticed something in the RHEL5 build while tracking down build errors.
For RHEL5 master build TS_USE_TLS_SNI is not defined which means the
function SSL_CTX_set_tlsext_servername_callback is not set in the
version of openssl used by RHEL5. This means that SSL certificate
support in 5.x will
The minimum version of any dependent package is (currently) what RHEL5
provides. We could simply list those I think?
-- Leif
> On Sep 21, 2014, at 6:23 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is something that apparently has never been brought up, we don't have
> a strict OpenSSL mini
Ok, so I just found this in SSLUtils.cc:
#if (OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x00090400L)# error Traffic Server requires
an OpenSSL library version 0.9.4 or greater
#endif
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 5:31 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2014, at 5:23 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
>
On Sep 21, 2014, at 5:23 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is something that apparently has never been brought up, we don't have
> a strict OpenSSL minimum version. By explicitly stating our minimum
> supported OpenSSL version we can clean up our SSL code, specifically around
> the SNI
