I don't see the relevance of recursiveness, a non-block lock can be
recursive. What "other threads" do you mean? Are the blocking locks
rare enough that we could implement them with brief usleep() and a
retry?
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:13 PM Alan Carroll wrote:
>
> Because having the locks be re
Because having the locks be recursive is a critical feature due to the tail
recursion used in event handling. And there are places (in other threads)
where blocking locks on Continuations are used.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:20 PM Walt Karas wrote:
> Why can't the mutexes for continuations simpl
