Re: ClientReq API

2011-10-21 Thread Alan M. Carroll
That's probably my fault. Please file a bug and assign it to me. Thanks. Friday, October 21, 2011, 10:26:37 AM, you wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:43:51 -0600 > Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> The thing is that we only keep one copy of the client request, and it >> gets modified. For a reverse proxy,

Re: ClientReq API

2011-10-21 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:43:51 -0600 Leif Hedstrom wrote: > The thing is that we only keep one copy of the client request, and it > gets modified. For a reverse proxy, that typically happens in the remap > phase, and for that reason, we have a hook named TS_HTTP_PRE_REMAP_HOOK. > Just for shit a

Re: ClientReq API

2011-10-12 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 10/12/2011 10:14 AM, Nick Kew wrote: Apart from these apparently-inconsistent semantics being confusing, the version I'm looking for is the first one, and I don't seem able to get it! Is this a bug? The thing is that we only keep one copy of the client request, and it gets modified. For a