Basically there is a construct called "special-include" and test 35 is
testing that in line 771 for processor_test.cc
The "stub" value for "handler" attribute specifies that
StubIncludeHandler.cc in the "test" directory should be used.
There seems to be some changes around Makefile.am that drops
St
TS 1249 created - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1249
Thanks.
Kit
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Brian Geffon wrote:
> Hi,
> The mailing list doesn't allow attachments. Would you mind creating a
> ticket and attaching the patch?
>
> Also, I believe someone recently fixed ESI in trunk
Hi,
The mailing list doesn't allow attachments. Would you mind creating a
ticket and attaching the patch?
Also, I believe someone recently fixed ESI in trunk (3.1.x), have you
by any chance taken a look at the fixes there?
Thanks for the contribution.
Brian
On May 6, 2012, at 12:12 AM, Shu Kit
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 14:49 -0800, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 2/3/12 1:06 PM, Kevin Fox wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 09:49 -0800, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> >> With a few tweeks here and there, I was just able to get it to build and
> >> properly parse a simple esi file.
> >>
> >> I'll post a patch
On 2/3/12 1:06 PM, Kevin Fox wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 09:49 -0800, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
With a few tweeks here and there, I was just able to get it to build and
properly parse a simple esi file.
I'll post a patch in a few.
Here's the patch I promised. Its rough right now but should give you
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 09:49 -0800, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> With a few tweeks here and there, I was just able to get it to build and
> properly parse a simple esi file.
>
> I'll post a patch in a few.
Here's the patch I promised. Its rough right now but should give you an
idea how to fix things.
It
On Feb 3, 2012, at 1:25 AM, Kevin Fox wrote:
> I think if someone can provide a stable ESI module for
> long enough and a document describing how to configure it, people would
> start showing up.
Yup, good observation. Count me in :-)
Jan
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 16:01 -0800, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:00:25 -0800
> Kevin Fox wrote:
>
> > Re-asking on the devel list instead.
> >
> > What is the current state of the trafficserver-plugins/esi plugin?
>
> Do you have an actual use for it?
>
> I ask because when I wrote
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:00:25 -0800
Kevin Fox wrote:
> Re-asking on the devel list instead.
>
> What is the current state of the trafficserver-plugins/esi plugin?
Do you have an actual use for it?
I ask because when I wrote an ESI parser module for HTTPD, it attracted
no real interest and I aba
With a few tweeks here and there, I was just able to get it to build and
properly parse a simple esi file.
I'll post a patch in a few.
Thanks,
Kevin
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 09:43 -0800, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 2/2/12 10:00 AM, Kevin Fox wrote:
> > > Re-asking on
- Original Message -
> On 2/2/12 10:00 AM, Kevin Fox wrote:
> > Re-asking on the devel list instead.
> >
> > What is the current state of the trafficserver-plugins/esi plugin?
> >
>
> It needs to be updated / ported to the current code base / API at a
> minimum.
> I have no idea of the ov
On 2/2/12 10:00 AM, Kevin Fox wrote:
Re-asking on the devel list instead.
What is the current state of the trafficserver-plugins/esi plugin?
It needs to be updated / ported to the current code base / API at a minimum.
I have no idea of the overall quality though.
-- Leif
Re-asking on the devel list instead.
What is the current state of the trafficserver-plugins/esi plugin?
Thanks,
Kevin
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 23:15 -0800, Igor Galić wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> you may be better off asking these kind of questions a broader audience, like
> users@ or in this case per
13 matches
Mail list logo
