On Apr 14, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Yongming Zhao wrote:
well, does that affect the ARM platform?
>>>
>>> ARMv6 (Raspberry Pi) and AR
- Original Message -
>
> On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Yongming Zhao wrote:
> >> well, does that affect the ARM platform?
> >
> > ARMv6 (Raspberry Pi) and ARMv7 is 32-bit, but ARMv8 is 64-bit. If
> > someone is runni
+1
> Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance
> environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going
> forward. I’m unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit systems or developing
> ATS on 32bit systems.
> I propose removing 32bit support in Apache T
On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Yongming Zhao wrote:
>> well, does that affect the ARM platform?
>
> ARMv6 (Raspberry Pi) and ARMv7 is 32-bit, but ARMv8 is 64-bit. If
> someone is running ATS on ARMv6 or ARMv7...they can always stay o
+1 - I don't know of anyone running ATS on 32-bit and I would highly recommend
not running it on 32-bit.
-Bryan
On Apr 11, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
> Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance
> environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32b
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Yongming Zhao wrote:
> well, does that affect the ARM platform?
ARMv6 (Raspberry Pi) and ARMv7 is 32-bit, but ARMv8 is 64-bit. If
someone is running ATS on ARMv6 or ARMv7...they can always stay on an
old release. -- justin
- Original Message -
> On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
>
> > Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance
> > environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going
> > forward. I’m unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit sys
On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
> Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance
> environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going
> forward. I’m unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit systems or developing
> ATS on 32bit syst
well, does that affect the ARM platform?
- Yongming Zhao 赵永明
在 2014年4月11日，下午11:51，Theo Schlossnagle 写道：
> Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance
> environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going
> forward. I’m unaware of anyone running ATS
On 4/11/2014 9:51 AM, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance
environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going forward.
I’m unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit systems or developing ATS on 32bit
systems.
Rasberr
This seems like a logical move for a 5.0 release, +1 from me.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
> Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance
> environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going
> forward. I'm unaware of anyon
Given the nature of ATS and its focus exclusively on high performance
environments, I suggest we throw off the bonds of 32bit support going forward.
I’m unaware of anyone running ATS on 32bit systems or developing ATS on 32bit
systems.
I propose removing 32bit support in Apache Traffic Server
12 matches
Mail list logo
