Re: [E] Re: Proposal: TS API: Don' t require a DbgCtl instance of have a tag when constructed.

2023-09-08 Thread Walt Karas
The general description of the use case is basically just that simple, you want to instantiate a DbgCtl without providing a tag, and provide the tag later. Zwoop requested this to support using the command name (from first in the array of arguments passed to main() ). Zwoop sent me this code, us

Re: Proposal: TS API: Don' t require a DbgCtl instance of have a tag when constructed.

2023-09-07 Thread James Peach
> On 6 Sep 2023, at 10:30 am, Walt Karas wrote: > > See https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/10375 . There’s no description either here or in the PR; could you please explain the use case for this? thanks, James

Re: Proposal: TS API: Don' t require a DbgCtl instance of have a tag when constructed.

2023-09-06 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Sep 5, 2023, at 6:30 PM, Walt Karas wrote: > > See https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/10375 . Love it. — Leif

Proposal: TS API: Don' t require a DbgCtl instance of have a tag when constructed.

2023-09-05 Thread Walt Karas
See https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/10375 .