It just sounds like he was using tsxs to build the plugin and linked with
only 1 of 6 or so of the compilation units required. Compiling with -O0
shouldn't make a difference.
Brian
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 13:24 +0800, Brian Geffon wrote:
> > Sound
On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 13:24 +0800, Brian Geffon wrote:
> Sounds like it wasn't properly linked, it's missing the symbol
Some build inconsistency between the plugin and the core.
> BgFetchConfig::readConfig(const char *config_file)
Could the compiler have optimised out that symbol?
Does compiling
hanks
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Sudheer Vinukonda
> wrote:
>
>> Ah, you are doing a progressive download (partial byte range request).
>>
>> ATS doesn't support caching partial byte range responses, but it does
>> support serving byte range requests from an
