Re: Empty lines after local variable declarations

2018-11-12 Thread Walt Karas
x27;t see the conflict. > >> > >>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Walt Karas > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> I'm more with the crowd that says you should keep the declaration as > >>> close as possible to the first use. > >>&

Re: Empty lines after local variable declarations

2018-11-12 Thread Leif Hedstrom
as >>> close as possible to the first use. >>>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 4:44 PM Leif Hedstrom wrote: >>>> >>>> This might sound petty, but I really much prefer that we consistently put >>>> empty lines after local variable declarations. We d

Re: Empty lines after local variable declarations

2018-11-12 Thread Walt Karas
t; >> I'm more with the crowd that says you should keep the declaration as >> close as possible to the first use. >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 4:44 PM Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> > >> > This might sound petty, but I really much prefer that we consistently put >

Re: Empty lines after local variable declarations

2018-11-12 Thread Alan Carroll
sound petty, but I really much prefer that we consistently > put empty lines after local variable declarations. We do so much of the > time, but definitely not consistently. Besides looking cleaner, doing this > consistently really helps making clang-format not indent code stupidly. > >

Re: Empty lines after local variable declarations

2018-11-12 Thread Walt Karas
I'm more with the crowd that says you should keep the declaration as close as possible to the first use. On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 4:44 PM Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > This might sound petty, but I really much prefer that we consistently put > empty lines after local variable declarat

Empty lines after local variable declarations

2018-11-11 Thread Leif Hedstrom
This might sound petty, but I really much prefer that we consistently put empty lines after local variable declarations. We do so much of the time, but definitely not consistently. Besides looking cleaner, doing this consistently really helps making clang-format not indent code stupidly. For