The performance is *much* better on ATS. It really depends on your traffic
patterns to determine how much better it will be. Also, the CPU usage is much
lower on ATS.
Some groups use RAID10 for ease of operation, but performance will be less then
using the disk devices directly.
You can emai
On Nov 8, 2013, at 2:07 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>
>> holds the similar type of feature which will gel well with RAID 10 level.
>> If not we will go ahead with RAID 0 to save more disk space for larger
>> cache. Currently we have 300GB cache on each ATS nodes.
>
> Given that Yahoo has switched
- Original Message -
> Hi Team,
>
> I would like to know few performance related information. We have capacity
> planning meeting for setting up a new cluster with AT. So your input will
> be a great value add in our capacity planning.
>
> Questions:
> 1) YTS(Yahoo Traffic Server) has
Hi Team,
I would like to know few performance related information. We have capacity
planning meeting for setting up a new cluster with AT. So your input will
be a great value add in our capacity planning.
Questions:
1) YTS(Yahoo Traffic Server) has some performance optimization which
utilizes th
