Apache Traffic Server 2.1.0-unstable released

2010-05-18 Thread John Plevyak
We are pleased to announce that Traffic Server 2.1.0-unstable is now available on the Apache mirrors. http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/trafficserver/ This is an unstable release from the development line so all issues reported will be fixed in the trunk. That said, 2.1.0-unstable brings a

Re: 2.1.0-unstable Call for VOTE

2010-05-14 Thread Mladen Turk
On 05/14/2010 01:31 AM, John Plevyak wrote: Tar ball updated with RAT, LICENSE, NOTICE changes. Other bits identical. Vote by Monday 8AM. +1 Tested on RHEL5 32 bit. RHEL5 x86_64 needs a LDFLAGS=-L/usr/lib64 during configure, but beside that works fine. Regards -- ^TM

Re: 2.1.0 unstable release VOTE!

2010-05-14 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 05/14/2010 11:12 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 05/14/2010 06:59 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: This ain't going to happen in 2.1.0 Not sure how promptly you guys expect 2.1.1 Release often, and early I think? I don't know what will go into 2.1.1, but I have no problems doing a biweekly release (or

Re: 2.1.0 unstable release VOTE!

2010-05-14 Thread Mladen Turk
On 05/14/2010 06:59 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: This ain't going to happen in 2.1.0 Not sure how promptly you guys expect 2.1.1 Release often, and early I think? I don't know what will go into 2.1.1, but I have no problems doing a biweekly release (or simply as often as necessary). Sure, +1

Re: 2.1.0 unstable release VOTE!

2010-05-14 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 05/12/2010 11:34 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: Finally, I think Mladen wanted one more bug to get landed into trunk, I'll defer to him and you on deciding if this should be landed or not. We obviously want to avoid possibly breaking builds on various platforms at this point, so if it lands, we'

Re: 2.1.0 unstable release VOTE!

2010-05-13 Thread Mladen Turk
On 05/12/2010 11:34 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: Finally, I think Mladen wanted one more bug to get landed into trunk, I'll defer to him and you on deciding if this should be landed or not. We obviously want to avoid possibly breaking builds on various platforms at this point, so if it lands, we'll

Re: 2.1.0-unstable Call for VOTE

2010-05-13 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 05/13/2010 05:31 PM, John Plevyak wrote: Tar ball updated with RAT, LICENSE, NOTICE changes. Other bits identical. Latest bits looks good to me, +1. -- leif

Re: 2.1.0-unstable Call for VOTE

2010-05-13 Thread Bryan Call
t; >> With 2 positives and tests on a number of platforms >> I am calling for a vote on the NEW 2.1.0-unstable release: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~jplevyak/ >> >> This vote will conclude Monday 8AM. >> >> Please vote. This is an unstable and there

Re: 2.1.0-unstable Call for VOTE

2010-05-13 Thread John Plevyak
Tar ball updated with RAT, LICENSE, NOTICE changes. Other bits identical. Vote by Monday 8AM. Thanx! john On 5/13/2010 12:26 PM, John Plevyak wrote: > > > With 2 positives and tests on a number of platforms > I am calling for a vote on the NEW 2.1.0-unstable releas

2.1.0-unstable Call for VOTE

2010-05-13 Thread John Plevyak
With 2 positives and tests on a number of platforms I am calling for a vote on the NEW 2.1.0-unstable release: http://people.apache.org/~jplevyak/ This vote will conclude Monday 8AM. Please vote. This is an unstable and there will be at least one more (2.1.1) before the next stable. john

Re: 2.1.0-unstable

2010-05-13 Thread George Paul
> >> >> >> Please take a look at >> >> http://people.apache.org/~jplevyak/ >> >> which contains the NEW candidate 2.1.0 unstable release. >> >> This is an unstable release, so it still contains a number >> of issues, but no serious r

Re: 2.1.0-unstable

2010-05-13 Thread Bryan Call
: > > > Please take a look at > > http://people.apache.org/~jplevyak/ > > which contains the NEW candidate 2.1.0 unstable release. > > This is an unstable release, so it still contains a number > of issues, but no serious regressions. > > Please consider it for release, I

2.1.0-unstable

2010-05-13 Thread John Plevyak
Please take a look at http://people.apache.org/~jplevyak/ which contains the NEW candidate 2.1.0 unstable release. This is an unstable release, so it still contains a number of issues, but no serious regressions. Please consider it for release, I'll send out for a vote if I don&#x

Re: 2.1.0 unstable release VOTE!

2010-05-12 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 5/12/10 3:01 PM, John Plevyak wrote: Please take a look at http://people.apache.org/~jplevyak/ which contains the candidate 2.1.0 unstable release. Please vote on releasing these bits. I checked the sig / checksums, and those look good. It compiles and starts on my MacOSX box, so

Re: 2.1.0 unstable release VOTE!

2010-05-12 Thread John Plevyak
Correction, we are waiting on TS-345 for 2.1.0. Stay tuned for new bits. john On 5/12/2010 2:01 PM, John Plevyak wrote: > > > Please take a look at > > http://people.apache.org/~jplevyak/ > > which contains the candidate 2.1.0 unstable release. > > > Pleas

2.1.0 unstable release VOTE!

2010-05-12 Thread John Plevyak
Please take a look at http://people.apache.org/~jplevyak/ which contains the candidate 2.1.0 unstable release. Please vote on releasing these bits. +1 john