Builds and passes regression on FC 15 64bit and 32bit for me.
+1
Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 2:42:07 PM, you wrote:
> Builds and passes regression on RHEL6. +1 from me.
> Brian
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Brian Geffon wrote:
>> Hello All,
>> We've prepared a package for a v3.0.5 release. P
Those commits don't exist in trunk...
Brian
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:08:11PM -0600, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>> If we decide not to reroll to fix OSX/clang, I'm +1 on this release,
>> it works on FC16 64-bit for me (with gcc).
>
> Fa
On May 13, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:08:11PM -0600, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> If we decide not to reroll to fix OSX/clang, I'm +1 on this
>>> release,
>>> it works on FC16 64-bit for me (with gcc).
>>
>> Fails for m
- Original Message -
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:08:11PM -0600, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> >
> > If we decide not to reroll to fix OSX/clang, I'm +1 on this
> > release,
> > it works on FC16 64-bit for me (with gcc).
>
> Fails for me, triggering internal compiler error:
>
> http://koji
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:08:11PM -0600, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> If we decide not to reroll to fix OSX/clang, I'm +1 on this release,
> it works on FC16 64-bit for me (with gcc).
Fails for me, triggering internal compiler error:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=4073944
On 5/12/12 10:27 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
It would be nice to have a stable ATS that builds on latest
gcc/fedora.., so I
It builds on Fedora/GCC, not on clang - also not on OS X.
would vote for doing another RC.
Another trivial backport request for 3.0.5/6:
TS-885/28b6e8f66dd3cce468d780b
- Original Message -
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:14:24PM -0700, Brian Geffon wrote:
> > Hey Igor,
> > What do you think we should do, should we bail on this 3.0.5 RC and
> > get TS-1116 fully in and try a new 3.0.5 RC? Considering we have
> > only
> > 2 +1s at the moment that might not b
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:14:24PM -0700, Brian Geffon wrote:
> Hey Igor,
> What do you think we should do, should we bail on this 3.0.5 RC and
> get TS-1116 fully in and try a new 3.0.5 RC? Considering we have only
> 2 +1s at the moment that might not be a terrible idea in my opinion..
It would b
Hey Igor,
What do you think we should do, should we bail on this 3.0.5 RC and
get TS-1116 fully in and try a new 3.0.5 RC? Considering we have only
2 +1s at the moment that might not be a terrible idea in my opinion..
Brian
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
> +1 Solaris 10 with
+1 Solaris 10 with Solaris Studio
-1 for clang/trunk
it appears we're missing TS-1116/19f36738
19f3673812d38704d9387dbbffc4c82b4c275f37
This may or may not be *my* mistake in STATUS
i
- Original Message -
> Hello All,
>
> We've prepared a package for a v3.0.5 release. Please take a lo
Builds and passes regression on RHEL6. +1 from me.
Brian
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Brian Geffon wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We've prepared a package for a v3.0.5 release. Please take a look at
> the artifacts, check the STATUS/README/CHANGES files, and do builds
> and tests. After finishing yo
Hello All,
We've prepared a package for a v3.0.5 release. Please take a look at
the artifacts, check the STATUS/README/CHANGES files, and do builds
and tests. After finishing your examination of the release candidate,
please cast your ±/0 votes, I will call the vote on May 11th 2012.
The source ta
12 matches
Mail list logo
