+1
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1 (Fed14, OSX)
>
> On Jul 15, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> > On 07/15/2011 05:12 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
> >> Thanks to Bryan for pointing this out the blindingly obvious number
> >>
> >> I fixed that and rolled the tag.
> >
+1 (Fed14, OSX)
On Jul 15, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 07/15/2011 05:12 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
>> Thanks to Bryan for pointing this out the blindingly obvious number
>>
>> I fixed that and rolled the tag.
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/traffic/tags/3.0.1/
>>
>>
@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server v3.0.1
+1: FC15 x86_64 built, passed regression, and using as my home forward proxy.
-Bryan
On Jul 15, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 07/15/2011 05:12 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
>> Thanks to Bryan for pointing thi
+1: FC15 x86_64 built, passed regression, and using as my home forward proxy.
-Bryan
On Jul 15, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 07/15/2011 05:12 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
>> Thanks to Bryan for pointing this out the blindingly obvious number
>>
>> I fixed that and rolled the tag.
>> htt
+1 from me:
checksums fit, compiles and passes regression tests on Ubuntu, 64 bit
after minor config change: proxy.config.hostdb.size -> 20 -> 12
this update from 2.1.9(?) runs perfectly fine in test:
http://blag.esotericsystems.at/
next up will be prod
cheers
- Original Message -
+1
tested on gentoo & rhel 5.4 64bit
在 2011-07-16六的 00:06 -0400，Igor Brezac写道：
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> > On 07/15/2011 05:12 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks to Bryan for pointing this out the blindingly obvious number
> >>
> >> I fixed that and rolled t
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 07/15/2011 05:12 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
>>
>> Thanks to Bryan for pointing this out the blindingly obvious number
>>
>> I fixed that and rolled the tag.
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/traffic/tags/3.0.1/
>>
>> zwoop was k
On 07/15/2011 05:12 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
Thanks to Bryan for pointing this out the blindingly obvious number
I fixed that and rolled the tag.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/traffic/tags/3.0.1/
zwoop was kind enough to provide the new tar balls,
because his key is "better" than m
2011/7/15 Igor Galić :
> Hi folks,
>
> I've prepared a package for a v3.0.1 release. Please take a look at
> the artifacts, check the STATUS/README/CHANGES files, and do builds
> and tests. After finishing your examination of the release candidate,
> please cast your ±/0 votes, I will call the vote
On 07/15/2011 05:12 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
Thanks to Bryan for pointing this out the blindingly obvious number
I fixed that and rolled the tag.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/traffic/tags/3.0.1/
zwoop was kind enough to provide the new tar balls,
because his key is "better" than m
Thanks to Bryan for pointing this out the blindingly obvious number
I fixed that and rolled the tag.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/traffic/tags/3.0.1/
zwoop was kind enough to provide the new tar balls,
because his key is "better" than mine :)
http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/
All the files have a 3.0.0 version number?
-Bryan
On 07/15/2011 01:57 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
Hi folks,
I've prepared a package for a v3.0.1 release. Please take a look at
the artifacts, check the STATUS/README/CHANGES files, and do builds
and tests. After finishing your examination of the relea
Hi folks,
I've prepared a package for a v3.0.1 release. Please take a look at
the artifacts, check the STATUS/README/CHANGES files, and do builds
and tests. After finishing your examination of the release candidate,
please cast your ±/0 votes, I will call the vote on 17th July 2011.
The source tar
13 matches
Mail list logo
