I'm with Brian. You need to do this some time with templates and it seems
busy to me. However there are probably exceptions...
On May 21, 2014 2:31 PM, "Brian Geffon" wrote:
> I think this-> is incredibly ugly an unnecessary, what does it really get
> us? It will be become convention just as ap
I think this-> is incredibly ugly an unnecessary, what does it really get
us? It will be become convention just as appending a underscore or adding
m_ in front of the name. In my opinion this-> should only be used in
situations where you need to disambiguate between variable names and not as
a conv
Hi all,
Leif pointed out that I've been doing this, and now I'd like to propose this as
an official style guideline.
Within a class member function, access to class members should use the
explicit "this->foo" syntax.
The rationale for this is that it makes it blindingly obvious that cl
