+1 for replacing LuaJIT configs with YAML.
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 3:01 AM, Bryan Call wrote:
> +1
>
> -Bryan
>
>
> > On May 7, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I’d like to propose that we eliminate the existing LuaJIT configurations
> with a simple YAML format. This w
+1
-Bryan
> On May 7, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’d like to propose that we eliminate the existing LuaJIT configurations with
> a simple YAML format. This would be the first step towards a unified
> configuration format, and I think we have to admit defeat on Lua,
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:47 AM Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’d like to propose that we eliminate the existing LuaJIT configurations
> with a simple YAML format. This would be the first step towards a unified
> configuration format, and I think we have to admit defeat on Lua, and do
> something
Hi,
I’d like to propose that we eliminate the existing LuaJIT configurations with a
simple YAML format. This would be the first step towards a unified
configuration format, and I think we have to admit defeat on Lua, and do
something simpler and more normal for both developers and users.
There
