[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2016-03-22 Thread zwoop
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-199878590 ping on API review? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2016-02-23 Thread bryancall
Github user bryancall commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-187818009 Talking at the github meeting. We should have a maximum size that will be buffered in memory. This should go through API review. Please provide documentation

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2016-01-04 Thread bgaff
Github user bgaff commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-168861430 Any other questions about this? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2015-12-14 Thread sudheerv
Github user sudheerv commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-164477764 Cool, thanks! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2015-12-14 Thread bgaff
Github user bgaff commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-164477595 That's correct since both use fetchsm if just works like a normal http 1.1 request, as that's what fetch sm is. I've verified this functionality. --- If your proje

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2015-12-14 Thread sudheerv
Github user sudheerv commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-164477130 @bgaff - Thanks, I'd have to double check though that the change made automatically handles a H2/SPDY upload. There's no Content-Length, nor even a TE header in

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2015-12-13 Thread bgaff
Github user bgaff commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-164333421 @sudheerv / @jpeach this pull request has been updated w/ tests for the chunked encoding case that @sudheerv was concerned about. Please let me know if you have any

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2015-12-06 Thread bgaff
Github user bgaff commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-162415337 @sudheerv, I've asked @zizhong to help in addressing the transfer-encoding chunked case, we should have an update soon. --- If your project is set up for it, you c

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2015-12-06 Thread bgaff
Github user bgaff commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-162403177 @sudheerv , the chunked encoding case is one that I don't think any browser actually does, have you ever seen a browser make a request w/ chunked encoding if so I'l

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2015-11-30 Thread sudheerv
Github user sudheerv commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-160778560 +1 on the approach. A specific comment on a quick scan of the code - it seems like the patch only handles the case with *Content-Length* header, what abo

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2015-11-29 Thread bgaff
Github user bgaff commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-160427748 @jpeach sure thing. Does anyone else have comments regarding the approach before we discuss the individual APIs? --- If your project is set up for it, you can repl

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2015-11-25 Thread jpeach
Github user jpeach commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-159765613 I quickly scanned the diff. The API changes will still need to go through API review on dev@. Documentation for the new APIs should be done as an API man page in t

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2015-11-25 Thread jacksontj
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351#issuecomment-159744211 Glad to see this PR finally make its way out :) We've been running with the base for this PR for quite a while. In addition to simplifying the code-- it really

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request...

2015-11-24 Thread bgaff
GitHub user bgaff opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/351 TS-4042: Add feature to buffer request body before making downstream requests We need a way to examine the request body without making a downstream request, this feature has many use cases inc