Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user shinrich commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122#issuecomment-121054986
@fpesce got the ssl_session_reuse in TS-3683 (cqssl rather than cssr for
the log field). It also includes session reuse via tickets.
Being able to recor
Github user shinrich commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122#discussion_r34509593
--- Diff: iocore/net/P_SSLNetVConnection.h ---
@@ -120,6 +120,28 @@ class SSLNetVConnection:public UnixNetVConnection
sslClientRenegotiationAb
Github user bryancall commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122#issuecomment-112870570
There is a related Jira for this:
Desire support for client TLS cipher in custom log format
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3648
---
If your pr
Github user jpeach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122#issuecomment-72101354
FWIW for this specific case, you can use the ``sslheaders`` plugin as a
workaround. Put the values you want into HTTP headers, then log those. In fact,
maybe using
Github user SolidWallOfCode commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122#issuecomment-60306213
While I agree with James' distaste, it will be rare for the NetVC to be
around to provide this information.
My recommendation at this point is to s
Github user jpeach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122#issuecomment-60304789
I don't like that this adds extra fields to HttpSM, can we avoid that by
accessing the netvc? or is it too late by the time we want to log?
---
If your project is
Github user sc0ttbeardsley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122#issuecomment-60270408
We should probably track this as a jira item...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user bellofreedom commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122#discussion_r18934621
--- Diff: iocore/net/P_SSLNetVConnection.h ---
@@ -120,6 +120,28 @@ class SSLNetVConnection:public UnixNetVConnection
sslClientRenegotiati
Github user acaciocenteno commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122#issuecomment-59286543
Did a test using spdycat and ATS did no log the SSL infos. Will dig into
the code tomorrow to learn why.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user sc0ttbeardsley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122#issuecomment-59230086
How will SPDY-enabled connections be logged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user acaciocenteno opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/122
Added SSL related fields to access.log
Added three fields to access log:
- SSL version, for instance 'TLSv1/SSLv3'.
- SSL cipher suite, for instance 'ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256'
12 matches
Mail list logo