Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the INKUDP* APIs

+1 On Tue, Sep 28, 2021, 2:31 PM Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > > On Sep 28, 2021, at 11:19 AM, Randall Meyer > wrote: > > > > I agree with Masakazu and am +1 for removing these APIs. > > +1 > > — Leif > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the INKUDP* APIs

> On Sep 28, 2021, at 11:19 AM, Randall Meyer > wrote: > > I agree with Masakazu and am +1 for removing these APIs. +1 — Leif

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the INKUDP* APIs

I agree with Masakazu and am +1 for removing these APIs. -r On Tuesday, September 28, 2021, 01:19:29 AM PDT, Masakazu Kitajo wrote: Let's remove the APIs. One week of silence probably means nobody cares about the APIs. If we keep the APIs, I want the maintainer to propose the APIs as

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the INKUDP* APIs

Let's remove the APIs. One week of silence probably means nobody cares about the APIs. If we keep the APIs, I want the maintainer to propose the APIs as official TS APIs and add documentation to make it clear that those are available for plugins. If nobody volunteers, we should remove the APIs. We

[DISCUSS] Removing the INKUDP* APIs

During the bug scrub on Monday we came across this issue: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/6245 The proposal is to remove the INKUDP* APIs in InkAPIPrivateIOCore.h (https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/blob/master/include/t