+1
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Alan Carroll <
solidwallofc...@oath.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Bryan Call wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Bryan
> >
> > > On May 10, 2018, at 2:05 PM, Susan Hinrichs >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I just discovered the TS API
> > >
> > >
+1
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Bryan Call wrote:
> +1
>
> -Bryan
>
> > On May 10, 2018, at 2:05 PM, Susan Hinrichs
> wrote:
> >
> > I just discovered the TS API
> >
> > void *TSHttpSsnConnectionGet(TSHttpSsn ssnp)
> >
> > This seems redundant with the TSVConnSSLConnectionGet and
> > TSHttp
+1
-Bryan
> On May 10, 2018, at 2:05 PM, Susan Hinrichs wrote:
>
> I just discovered the TS API
>
> void *TSHttpSsnConnectionGet(TSHttpSsn ssnp)
>
> This seems redundant with the TSVConnSSLConnectionGet and
> TSHttpSsnClientVConnGet functions.
>
> I propose removing it.
>
> If we need to ke
> On May 10, 2018, at 2:46 PM, Susan Hinrichs wrote:
>
> Typo'd the name. Should be
>
> void *TSHttpSsnSSLConnectionGet(TSHttpSsn ssnp)
>
Yeh, we should nuke this in favor of the two finer granular APIs.
+1
— Leif
Typo'd the name. Should be
void *TSHttpSsnSSLConnectionGet(TSHttpSsn ssnp)
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Susan Hinrichs wrote:
> I just discovered the TS API
>
> void *TSHttpSsnConnectionGet(TSHttpSsn ssnp)
>
> This seems redundant with the TSVConnSSLConnectionGet and
> TSHttpSsnClientVConn
I just discovered the TS API
void *TSHttpSsnConnectionGet(TSHttpSsn ssnp)
This seems redundant with the TSVConnSSLConnectionGet and
TSHttpSsnClientVConnGet functions.
I propose removing it.
If we need to keep this, we should document the API and change the
signature to return TSSslConnection in
