On Dec 20, 2016 10:02 AM, Assaf Cohen wrote:
> Is there a way to create timer, register it and get notified on expiration?
You can use TSContCreate & TSContSchedule/TSContScheduleEvery to create an
arbitrary callback that will be called when a timer expires/periodically.
Cheers,
> On Apr 10, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Phil Sorber wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose that we deprecate SSLv2 and SSLv3 in ATS 6.2.0 and
> remove it in 7.0.0.
>
> Currently our defaults do not enable them and have been that way for about
> a year now. For 6.2.0 I'd like to mark them deprecated in the
> docu
Hi Daniel,
Note that we already support your first solution via syslog (for
traffic.out and
diags.log) -- you can set a different backend for log types/priorities
(check out proxy.config.diags.output.
Regarding the second option -- If the logging volume is small you
can probable get by wi
Hi Brian,
I'm not sure how you're getting this behavior - reenabling with
TS_EVENT_HTTP_ERROR on the TS_EVENT_HTTP_SEND_REQUEST_HDR should not release
the headers to the upstream server. The connection should be established and
immediately torn down without any data being transmitted by the
Hi Brian,
You need to call TSHttpTxnErrorBodySet, hook on the SEND_RESPONSE_HDR
hookpoint and reenable the transaction.
When you get the SEND_RESPONSE_HDR event you can set the status/headers as
desired.
Cheers,
Uri
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:51:42 -0700 Phil Sorber wrote:
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 4.2.0 (RC1)
> From: sor...@apache.org
> To: us...@trafficserver.apache.org; dev@trafficserver.apache.org
>
> Hello All,
>
> It's been a while since RC0, and we've tracked down quite a few bugs. So
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:59:46 +0200 Roee Gil wrote
> Subject: Null transform slow down connection
snip
> I'm trying to understand what are the trade off when I use transform.
> so I did a speed test at this site: http://www.speedtest.net/
>
> and checked it without ATS, with ATS with no plugins and f
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:27:33 -0600 Alan M. Carroll
wrote:
> Subject: Re: Range transform problems
>
> Tuesday, December 10, 2013, 10:29:36 PM, you wrote:
>
>> On Dec 9, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Alan M. Carroll
>> wrote:
>
>>> I've been failing at solving the range transform issue for quite a while. I
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:33:05 -0700 James Peach wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose that we add formal API reviews to out development
> process. The rationale for this is:
> - API is important enough that we should go to extra effort to make it
> consistent and straightforward to use
> - API c
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:49:19 -0700 James Peach wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Uri Shachar wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:45:41 -0700 James Peach wrote:
>>> On Oct 13, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Uri Shachar wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:41:42 -0700 James Peach w
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:45:41 -0700 James Peach wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Uri Shachar wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:41:42 -0700 James Peach wrote:
>>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:19 PM, ushac...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>>> Updated Branches:
>&g
Thanks for the review James.
I agree with most of your points -- with a couple of exceptions:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:41:42 -0700 James Peach wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:19 PM, ushac...@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Updated Branches:
> > refs/heads/master 7ba121c9a -> 3c0c835c1
> >
> >
> > TS-226
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:49:56 Dani wrote:
> Subject: can traffic server transform delay the headers response ?
...
> i would like to edit the http headers returned to the browser based on the
> analysis i do in the transform, but i found that the headers are already
> returned to the browser BEFORE
+1
Compiled, regression passes and running as forward proxy on CentOS 6.3 and
Ubuntu 12.04
> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:35:35 -0600
> From: zw...@apache.org
> To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org; us...@trafficserver.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release v3.3.2
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've prepared a release
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:29:43 -0700
> From: jplev...@acm.org
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Alan M. Carroll <
> a...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > > There is, however, one situation where this simple and safe order of
> > events
> > > is not followed. That is connection sh
Hi,
When attempting to troubleshoot issues on a production ATS system, it is
often impossible/difficult to turn on any of the 'high-volume' debug tags like
http due to the performance impact.
I have a 'transaction specific debugging' implementation in an old
pre-opensource TrafficServer
should be shared over as much of the connection as possible as
> acquiring it gives access to all state that it covers. Normally plenty of
> parallelism to go around.
>
> john
>
> 2011/10/3 Uri Shachar
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is a known behavior (and should just be better
documented), a bug or just bad practices on my part -- Flow goes like this:
1) In a global hook, create a continuation X and attach it to several
hookpoints in a transaction Y.
2) When called through one of the hook
rs are formatted ok), with all headers in the
buffer being available.
The parsed data will sometimes not contain the last header in the buffer.
Cheers,
Uri Shachar
19 matches
Mail list logo
