I will be happy to help as well.
Regards,
Shaun
-Original Message-
From: Alan M. Carroll [mailto:a...@network-geographics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 3:41 PM
To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support for HTTP Upgrade in transparent proxy
Tuesday, January 21, 2014,
it would
leave the headers intact and then switch to tunneling mode when the 101
Switching Protocols response is received.
Regards,
Shaun McGinnity
Hi Carlos,
Have you tried sending TS_EVENT_VCONN_EOS to the VConn write VIO?
Regards,
Shaun
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Guerreiro [mailto:carlos.h.guerre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 10:51 AM
To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: Re: what is the correct way to a
Hi Carlos,
Have you tried sending TS_EVENT_VCONN_EOS to the VConn write VIO? (This was
Alan's recommendation and it works for us.)
Regards,
Shaun
On Oct 28, 2013, at 3:51 AM, Carlos Guerreiro
wrote:
> Thanks for the hint.
>
> I've tried that before (and again now). Unfortunately I get an ass
r dropping
background_fill_completed_threshold to a small percentage (1%; and clearing the
cache), and repeating, only the first request hit the origin. (tests run on
3.3.4, mac osx, with localhost httpd as origin, and ~400MB object).
miles
- Original Message -----
From: Shaun McGinnity
Hi Miles,
Background fill is not related to serving from cache. The docs describe
proxy.config.http.background_fill_completed_threshold as "The proportion of
total document size already transferred when a client aborts at which the proxy
continues fetching the document from the origin server to
[nop,nop,TS val 270075670 ecr 270075670], length 0
I would appreciate any help to resolve this issue or any pointers to where I
should start looking in the traffic server code.
Regards,
Shaun McGinnity
0.5957 traffic_server
HttpTransact::initialize_state_variables_from_response(HttpTransact::State*,
HTTPHdr*)
Shaun
-Original Message-
From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zw...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 1:53 AM
To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Cc: Sha
% for the same transaction rate.
Is this increase in CPU to be expected? It seems rather large for a transform
that is just reading and writing data.
Any advice is appreciated.
Regards,
Shaun McGinnity
