Re: Vote: Remove autotools build files from the repository (ATS 10)

+1 Goodbye autotools! On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 08:55:07 AM PDT, Brian Neradt wrote: +1 Maintaining both build tools would be very burdensome. On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:36 AM Chris McFarlen wrote: > With each CI job now using cmake, the autotools configuration setup will > q

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 9.2.3 (RC0)

+1  Built on macOS Sonoma (14.0) and tests pass. -Randall On Monday, October 9, 2023 at 02:59:59 PM PDT, Masakazu Kitajo wrote: +1 It builds and test passes on Debian 11. Confirmed the checksum. On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 2:58 PM Bryan Call wrote: > I've prepared a release for 9.2.3.  T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 9.2.2 (RC0)

+1 Builds on macOS, make check passes On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 10:10:19 AM PDT, Bryan Call wrote: I've prepared a release for 9.2.2.  The release notes are available at:     https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pulls?q=is:closed+is:pr+milestone:9.2.2 or for a brief ChangeLo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 9.2.0 (RC0)

+1 macOS > On Jan 18, 2023, at 8:59 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > +1 from me as well, of course. > > — Leif > > >> On Jan 12, 2023, at 12:01 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> >> I've prepared a release for 9.2.0 (RC0), which is a minor release for 9.x, >> and is still backwards compatible with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 8.1.6 (RC0)

+1 - tested on macOS 13, builds, checks On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 09:38:33 AM PST, Evan Zelkowitz wrote: +1 - tested on Ubuntu 20, checksums, build, checks On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:11 AM Bryan Call wrote: > +1 - tested on Fedora 37.  Tested checksums, build, unit tests, a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 9.1.4 (RC0)

+1 - tested on macOS 13, builds, checks On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 09:38:53 AM PST, Evan Zelkowitz wrote: +1 - tested on ubuntu 20, build, checksums, checks On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:11 AM Bryan Call wrote: > +1 - tested on Fedora 37.  Tested checksums, build, unit tests, an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 8.1.4 (RC0)

+1, built and tested on macOS (Intel) On Thursday, March 17, 2022, 09:48:40 AM PDT, Leif Hedstrom wrote: +1, verified, built, tested on macOS. There are some compiler warnings that should be addressed for v8.1.5, but not critical for v8.1.4. — leif On Mar 16, 2022, at 15:24, Evan Ze

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 9.1.2 (RC1)

+1 built and tested on macOS (Intel) On Monday, February 28, 2022, 04:47:19 PM PST, Leif Hedstrom wrote: I've prepared a release for 9.1.2 (RC1), which is a bug fix release for 9.1.x and is backwards compatible. This adds a few fixes that was proposed after the first RC0 candidate.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 9.1.2 (RC0)

+1 build and tested on macOS (Intel) On Tuesday, February 15, 2022, 09:43:24 PM PST, Leif Hedstrom wrote: I've prepared a release for 9.1.2 (RC0), which is a bug fix release for 9.1.x and is backwards compatible. For a list of all PRs in this release, see     https://github.com/apac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 8.1.3 (RC1)

+1 On Monday, November 1, 2021, 02:50:08 PM PDT, Bryan Call wrote: I've prepared a release for 8.1.3.  The release notes are available at:     https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pulls?q=is%3Aclosed+is%3Apr+milestone%3A8.1.3

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 9.1.1 (RC2)

+1 On Monday, November 1, 2021, 02:50:01 PM PDT, Bryan Call wrote: I've prepared a release for 9.1.1.  The release notes are available at: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pulls?q=is%3Aclosed+is%3Apr+milestone%3A9.1.1 or for a brief ChangeLog: https://github.com/apache/traf

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 9.1.1 (RC1)

+1 On Monday, November 1, 2021, 08:41:59 AM PDT, Bryan Call wrote: +1 from me -Bryan On Oct 29, 2021, at 10:10 AM, Bryan Call wrote: I've prepared a release for 9.1.1.  The release notes are available at: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pulls?q=is%3Aclosed+is%3Apr+milest

Re: [VOTE] new API for getting the SNI for a client connection

onnSslSniGet, maybe. Good point, and seeing that this acts on a TSVConn, we ought to stick to that naming convention. — Leif > > Masakazu > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:02 AM Randall Meyer > wrote: > >> Hello! >>  I'd like to propose adding a new API get gra

[VOTE] new API for getting the SNI for a client connection

Hello! I'd like to propose adding a new API get grab the SNI from the client connection. const char * TSSslSNIGet(TSVConn sslp, int *length) This would remove some of the redundant code in the rate_limit plugin but also would allow for the rate_limit plugin to be used under BoringSSL. The API

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the INKUDP* APIs

I agree with Masakazu and am +1 for removing these APIs. -r On Tuesday, September 28, 2021, 01:19:29 AM PDT, Masakazu Kitajo wrote: Let's remove the APIs. One week of silence probably means nobody cares about the APIs. If we keep the APIs, I want the maintainer to propose the APIs as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 9.1.0 (RC0)

+1 Built on macOS, tests passed. On Tuesday, August 10, 2021, 12:11:52 PM PDT, Leif Hedstrom wrote: I've prepared a release for 9.1.0 (RC0), which is both a new feature and bug fix release. This release of v9.1.0 is backwards compatible with all v9.0.x releases. The intent is that v9

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 9.0.2 (RC0)

+1 On Tuesday, June 22, 2021, 08:35:16 AM PDT, Leif Hedstrom wrote: I've prepared a release for 9.0.2 (RC0), which is a bug fix release. For a list of all PRs, see     https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/milestone/48?closed=1 or for a brief ChangeLog (also attached below):    

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic server 8.1.2 (RC0)

+1 On Wednesday, June 23, 2021, 11:22:55 AM PDT, Evan Zelkowitz wrote: Ive prepared a release for 8.1.2 (RC0), which is a bug fix release. For a list of all PRs, see         https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/milestone/47?closed=1 or for a brief ChangeLog (also attached below)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 9.0.1 (RC1)

+1 On Saturday, April 10, 2021, 03:21:58 PM PDT, Leif Hedstrom wrote: I've prepared a another release for 9.0.1 (RC1), which is a bug fix release only. For a list of all PRs, see     https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/milestone/31?closed=1 or for a brief ChangeLog (also attach

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 7.1.12 (RC0)

+1 On Tuesday, December 1, 2020, 01:21:21 PM PST, Bryan Call wrote: I've prepared a release for 7.1.12.  The release notes for 7.1.12 are available at: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pulls?q=is%3Aclosed+is%3Apr+milestone%3A7.1.12 or for a brief ChangeLog: https://github

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 8.1.1 (RC0)

+1 On Tuesday, December 1, 2020, 01:21:11 PM PST, Bryan Call wrote: I've prepared a release for 8.1.1.  The release notes for 8.1.1 are available at:     https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pulls?q=is:closed+is:pr+milestone:8.1.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 8.1.0 (RC0)

+1 On Monday, August 24, 2020, 03:39:20 PM PDT, Leif Hedstrom wrote: I've prepared a release for 8.1.0 (RC0), which is a release focusing on stability and usability. In particular, we’ve made a number of improvements to stability, reliability and performance for HTTP/2 in this releas

Re: Removing proxy.config. settings for filenames

+1 On Friday, November 1, 2019, 06:52:45 AM PDT, Leif Hedstrom wrote: Hi all, I’d like to remove all (most?) of the settings that lets you override configuration file names via records.config. We have other means to accomplish this (environment variables / runroot), and, many times,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 8.0.5

+1 On Tuesday, August 20, 2019, 10:58:51 AM PDT, Sudheer Vinukonda wrote: +1     On Tuesday, August 20, 2019, 10:39:39 AM PDT, Bryan Call wrote:  I've prepared a release for 8.0.5.  The release notes for 8.0.5 are available at:     https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pulls

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 7.1.8

+1  On Tuesday, August 20, 2019, 10:41:18 AM PDT, Evan Zelkowitz wrote: +1 On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:39 AM Bryan Call wrote: > > I've prepared a release for 7.1.8.  The release notes for 7.1.8 are available > at: > >        >https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pulls?utf8=✓&q=is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 8.0.4

+1 > On Aug 13, 2019, at 11:54 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > +1. > > — leif > > >> On Aug 13, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Bryan Call wrote: >> >> I've prepared a release for 8.0.4. The release notes for 8.0.4 are >> available at: >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pulls?utf8=✓&q=

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove / Deprecation of plugins

+1 On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 2:43:35 PM PDT, Sudheer Vinukonda wrote: +1     On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 2:24:15 PM PDT, Leif Hedstrom wrote:  Hi all, >From the spring summit, we’d like to propose that this plugin gets marked >deprecated for v9.0.0, and removed for v10.0.0: mysql

Re: [PROPOSAL] Plugins to promote to stable

+1 On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 2:37:12 PM PDT, Sudheer Vinukonda wrote: +1      On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 2:28:26 PM PDT, Leif Hedstrom wrote:  Hi all, from the spring summit, here’s the list of proposed plugins to get promoted to stable:     •  cache_promote     •  cache_range_

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove SSL v3 code and configs

+1 On Thursday, June 6, 2019, 5:32:10 PM PDT, Leif Hedstrom wrote: This code is disabled and does not build by default. I think it’s time to remove this code path completely, it’s an insecure protocol, and I don’t think any of us enables this ? — Leif

[PROPOSAL] Rename ssl_server_name.yaml to sni.yaml

I'd like to rename ssl_server_name.yaml to sni.yaml for ATS 9. This would also affect the toplevel key in the yaml config file (making the contents rooted under "sni"). The code/classes it is used to configure is SNIConfig. And personally, I find the current name to be a bit of a mouthful.

Re: HTTP Testing Resources · httpwg/wiki Wiki

Those were found via the Instruments app (part of Xcode) on the Mac. -r > On Apr 15, 2019, at 9:11 AM, Walt Karas > wrote: > > Do you have links to other testing tools you use? I noticed you mentioned > a mem leak finding tool recently. > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:51 PM Leif Hedstrom wrot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 8.0.3 (RC0)

+1  We've been running with 8.0.3 in production for several weeks without issue. -Randall On Monday, March 11, 2019, 11:15:18 AM PDT, Bryan Call wrote: I've prepared a release for 8.0.3 (RC0).  The release notes for 8.0.3 are available at:     https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/

github draft PRs

This looks like something good to explore using. https://github.blog/2019-02-14-introducing-draft-pull-requests/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 8.0.2 (RC0)

+1 We've got several hundred hosts running 8.0.2 taking production traffic.On Tuesday, January 22, 2019, 3:23:48 PM PST, Chou, Peter wrote: Regression test -R 2 passed on Ubuntu Linux 18.04 LTS Server. -Original Message- From: Bryan Call Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 12:4

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 8.0.1 (RC0)

+1  Currently running on 40+ machines worldwide.  On Tuesday, November 20, 2018, 4:00:54 PM PST, Bryan Call wrote: I've prepared a release for 8.0.1 (RC0).  The release notes for 8.0.1 are available at:     https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aclosed+is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 7.1.5 (RC1)

+1 On Saturday, November 17, 2018, 11:50:42 PM PST, Leif Hedstrom wrote: I've prepared a release for 7.1.5 (RC1), which is a bug fix release on the previous v7.1.4 release. Besides regular bug fixes, this version also addresses a number of small memory leaks. The release notes for 7

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 7.1.4 (RC1)

+1 On Wednesday, July 25, 2018, 5:19:39 PM PDT, Leif Hedstrom wrote: +1 from me, tested on ~100 prod boxes. — Leif > On Jul 25, 2018, at 15:54, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > >> On Jul 25, 2018, at 15:51, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> >> I've prepared a new release for 7.1.4 (RC1), which

Re: C++ YAML library

Hi,   I am looking at/using yaml-cpp (https://github.com/jbeder/yaml-cpp). It seems to be a recently-active project,  C++-based and the API is simple to use/comprehend.  I've tried using the 0.3 version, but it uses std::auto_ptr (now removed in C++17) and it looks like up until 0.6, it depende