This builds and passes tests on Fedora 40/41 and RHEL 8/9.
--Jered
- On Jan 29, 2025, at 4:39 PM, Evan Zelkowitz wrote:
> I've prepared a release for 9.2.8. The release notes are available at:
> [ https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/milestone/80?closed=1 |
> https://github.com/apache
This also looks good on Fedora rawhide (42). Once I resolve some packaging
concerns around upgrade from 9.x this will be available in the repo.
--Jered
- On Jan 29, 2025, at 9:12 AM, Chris McFarlen wrote:
> There were a couple of issues found with 10.0.3-rc0 (thanks to those that
> repo
This looks good on Fedora rawhide (42).
RHEL 10 no longer has support for the old libpcre, so it is not possible to
build there. Is anyone actively working on updating the remaining libpcre use?
--Jered
- On Jan 27, 2025, at 8:59 AM, Chris McFarlen ch...@mcfarlen.us wrote:
> I've prepar
library was imported into, and
substantially changed for, Trafficserver 10. Here's the equivalent file now:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/blob/master/lib/swoc/include/swoc/Errata.h
--Jered
> On Thursday, January 9, 2025 at 01:00:09 PM EST, Jered Floyd
> wrote:
>
2025, at 3:31 PM, Jered Floyd je...@convivian.com wrote:
> Happy new year!
>
> I finally added a debugger into my mock build environment to debug the
> test_libswoc assertion failures I see trying to build trafficserver 10 for
> Fedora/RHEL production.
>
> Here is th
tch2/catch.hpp:13233
#34 main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffe218) at
/builddir/build/BUILD/trafficserver-10.0.2-build/trafficserver-10.0.2/lib/swoc/unit_tests/unit_test_main.cc:36
- On Dec 13, 2024, at 5:01 PM, Jered Floyd je...@convivian.com wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Sorry for the delay i
odies of the verify_remap_plugin and verify_global_plugin in
> cmake/add_atsplugin.cmake. Just leave the function definitions in place.
> I might be able to help with the linking issues as well if you can provide
> some
> steps to reproduce.
> Thanks!
> Chris
> Sent with Proton
ld; ctest" will not pass unless there is an
existing install of traffic server installed. Have I missed something here?
Thanks,
--Jered
----- On Nov 14, 2024, at 11:56 AM, Jered Floyd je...@convivian.com wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am trying to get ATS 10.x ready for Fedora rawhid
Hello!
I am trying to get ATS 10.x ready for Fedora rawhide/f42 and EPEL 10, and am
running into some problems with CMake execution. I've banged my head against it
for a few days so now I'm reaching out in hopes of finding an ATS CMake expert.
What seems to be happening is that the build nea
e tests. Since nobody
has reported this to our Bugzilla, I'm guessing that nobody is using these
builds. :-)
Regards,
--Jered
- On Nov 12, 2024, at 8:45 PM, Jered Floyd je...@convivian.com wrote:
> Well, how about that. Thanks!
>
> Builds submitted for all active Fedora and
s a more recent KEYS file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/trafficserver/KEYS
>
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
> On Tuesday, November 12th, 2024 at 4:57 PM, Jered Floyd
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not able to verify the signature against the provide
I'm not able to verify the signature against the provided KEYS file; does a key
need to be added?
$ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/gpgverify
--keyring=/home/jered/fedora-scm/trafficserver/KEYS
--signature=/home/jered/fedora-scm/trafficserver/trafficserver-9.2.6.tar.bz2.asc
--data=/home/jered/fedora-scm/
Completed successfully and tests passed on all targets and architectures.
--Jered
- On Jul 23, 2024, at 11:37 PM, Jered Floyd je...@convivian.com wrote:
> Scratch build/test now running against f39, f40, rawhide, el8, el9:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?&owner=jered
Scratch build/test now running against f39, f40, rawhide, el8, el9:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?&owner=jered&state=all
--Jered
- On Jul 23, 2024, at 6:36 PM, Bryan Call bc...@apache.org wrote:
> I've prepared a release for 9.2.5. The release notes are available at:
>
>
This is pushing to testing on all active repos. If you can test and upvote, it
will reach stable faster than the regular 7 day period:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=trafficserver
--Jered
- On Apr 3, 2024, at 3:30 PM, Jered Floyd je...@convivian.com wrote:
> Lo
Looks good on el{7,8,9} and fc{38,39,40,41}.
--Jered
- On Apr 3, 2024, at 12:09 PM, Masakazu Kitajo mas...@apache.org wrote:
> +1 Built and tested on Debian 11. Confirmed the checksum is correct.
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 9:59 AM Bryan Call wrote:
>
>> I've prepared a release for 9.2.4
FYI, 9.2.3 is now available in epel-testing: [
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing ]
--Jered
- On Oct 10, 2023, at 12:12 AM, Bryan Call wrote:
> I am calling the vote with 4 +1 votes.
> -Bryan
>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 1:58
This update is in progress. The RPMs are linked here, and if you have a Fedora
Project account you can upvote to get this into stable faster:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a08f6a3e19
--Jered
- On Oct 4, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Jered Floyd je...@convivian.com wrote
will let us skip the 7 day wait to stable.
--Jered
- On Oct 3, 2023, at 11:48 AM, Steve Malenfant smalenf...@gmail.com wrote:
> FYI - I recompiled ATS 8.1.x with OpenSSL 1.1 (EPEL) and that worked for
> us. (Centos 7)
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:33 AM Jered Floyd wrote:
>
Chrome 117 has just rolled out denial of SHA1 signature algorithms (for header
signing -- not ciphers which have already been removed) and now Chome on any
platform is unable to connect to trafficserver 9.2.2 on RHEL 7. I'm the
Fedora/RHEL package maintainer so this is my problem, but before I
Packaging for 9.2.1 is also pushed to testing in Fedora and EPEL and will
release in ~6 days:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=trafficserver
If you're running Fedora, RHEL, or a RHEL-like OS I'd appreciate any testing
(and voting in the updates system above, which can acceler
I've released this to Fedora 38 (Rawhide) and updates will push to testing for
other active Fedora/EPEL versions in ~24h (and release in 7 days):
[ https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=trafficserver |
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=trafficserver ]
Building on rawhid
A recent Fedora ticket ( [ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101076
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101076 ] ) noted that the
trafficserver process tries to run "example_alarm_bin.sh"; this originates from
this line in RecordsConfig.cc:
[
https://github.com/apache/tr
To (finally) follow up on this, ATS 9.1.2 is now in the Fedora and EPEL8 repos,
and should land in EPEL7 and EPEL9 shortly:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=trafficserver
Regards,
--Jered
- On Apr 18, 2022, at 6:12 PM, Jered Floyd je...@convivian.com wrote:
> He
SF slack channel recently. If
> you're not there, let me know. I'll invite you.
>
> — Masaori
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 7:13 AM Jered Floyd wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello! This is just a short note to introduce myself, and share a new
>> packaging
>>
Hello! This is just a short note to introduce myself, and share a new packaging
effort for Fedora and EPEL-using (RHEL, CentOS, etc.) Linuxes.
You can review and test ATS 9.1.2 packages for these platforms here, but I
intend for them to be in the official repo soon.
[ https://copr.fedorainfra
I can't tell if this is possibly related to this closed issue: [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1935 |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1935 ]
Yesterday I had a DoS incident where a single client generating 30-50 requests
per second caused my ATS instance to fail. The failur
27 matches
Mail list logo
