Hi All,
Can someone take a look at the iptables trace below and see if I am making
an error with my ATS linux bridge mode configuration? I've been trying to
configure ATS in linux bridge mode but have been unsuccessful. I think I've
followed the documentation to the dot. However, the packets are no
+1
On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 2:43:35 PM PDT, Sudheer Vinukonda
wrote:
+1
On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 2:24:15 PM PDT, Leif Hedstrom
wrote:
Hi all,
>From the spring summit, we’d like to propose that this plugin gets marked
>deprecated for v9.0.0, and removed for v10.0.0:
mysql
+1
On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 2:37:12 PM PDT, Sudheer Vinukonda
wrote:
+1
On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 2:28:26 PM PDT, Leif Hedstrom
wrote:
Hi all,
from the spring summit, here’s the list of proposed plugins to get promoted to
stable:
• cache_promote
• cache_range_
+1
On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 2:24:15 PM PDT, Leif Hedstrom
wrote:
Hi all,
>From the spring summit, we’d like to propose that this plugin gets marked
>deprecated for v9.0.0, and removed for v10.0.0:
mysql_remap buffer_upload memcached_remap
In addition, we’d like to remove these plugi
+1
On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 2:28:26 PM PDT, Leif Hedstrom
wrote:
Hi all,
from the spring summit, here’s the list of proposed plugins to get promoted to
stable:
• cache_promote
• cache_range_requests (need docs)
• multiplexer
• prefetch
• remap_purge
•
Hi all,
from the spring summit, here’s the list of proposed plugins to get promoted to
stable:
• cache_promote
• cache_range_requests (need docs)
• multiplexer
• prefetch
• remap_purge
• remap_stats (need docs)
In addition, we’d like to move
Hi all,
From the spring summit, we’d like to propose that this plugin gets marked
deprecated for v9.0.0, and removed for v10.0.0:
mysql_remap
buffer_upload
memcached_remap
In addition, we’d like to remove these plugin for v9.0.0:
stale_while_revalidate
Although the old name has never been used, since it wasn't just
undocumented, it was inaccessible.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:25 PM Sudheer Vinukonda
wrote:
> +1
> I definitely like the idea of preserving the API name that's already
> existed and throwing away the unimplemented one!
> On Tues
+1
I definitely like the idea of preserving the API name that's already existed
and throwing away the unimplemented one!
On Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 11:36:00 AM PDT, Alan M. Carroll
wrote:
In the current documentation is the C API function TSIOBufferReaderRead which
reads from an IOBu
In the current documentation is the C API function TSIOBufferReaderRead which
reads from an IOBufferReader in to a fixed buffer, the dual of
TSIOBufferWriter. This function is not actually implemented which has caused
some consternation. In working on providing an implementation, I came across a
10 matches
Mail list logo
