The codebase of the microserver is easier to debug and less volatile than
ATS, you'd want the codebase on that side to be reliable.
We should also worry about subtly changing behaviour of the ATS origin
which would break the tests not so subtly I guess.
Making the origin a moving target might not b
It seems unlikely that an error in one trafficserver instance would correct
an error in the other.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 9:21 AM Jason Kenny wrote:
> No,
>
> The issue here is that if trafficserver is broken we test with broken
> trafficserver that could result in everything passing.
>
>
>
> O
Well, there would be two instances of ATS running, one as the "server" and
another as the test object. I think the bigger problem is that your testing
is much less reliable, since errors could get dropped between the two
instances of the same software, or be hard to track down. You get better
resul
