Re: [trafficserver] branch master updated: Removes the tsqa tests, to avoid confusion. Use autest.

On 24 May 2017, at 18:12, zw...@apache.org wrote: This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. zwoop pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this pus

Re: Unit Test Framework

On 24 May 2017, at 15:00, Alan Carroll wrote: James; it's precisely because those tests don't depend on anything else in traffic_server that it seems bogus to require building and running it to do the tests. If you're in a tight edit/compile/test cycle it's nice to not have to drag in everyt

Re: ATS Spring Summit 2017 Slides

I tried to upload my presentation, but looks like do not have privilege. Got the following error response: disk_hotswap_feature.pptx You'll need to ask permission to insert files here. Would you please help to add permission for me? My account is: User name: zhilhuan Email: zhilh...@cisco.com

Re: ATS Spring Summit 2017 Slides

Traffic Control slides are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TC/Spring+2017 On 5/24/17, 8:00 PM, "Shu Kit Chan" wrote: Would we also have access to the presentation slides from the traffic control summit as well? And can you provide a link to that? or are they going

Re: ATS Spring Summit 2017 Slides

Would we also have access to the presentation slides from the traffic control summit as well? And can you provide a link to that? or are they going to appear in our cwiki as well? Thanks a lot Kit On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > If you gave a presentation at the ATS Summit

ATS Spring Summit 2017 Slides

If you gave a presentation at the ATS Summit please upload your presentation to cwiki and add an entry to to list of presentations. Cwiki attachments (just drag files to it): https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpageattachments.action?pageId=70255385

Re: Unit Test Framework

James; it's precisely because those tests don't depend on anything else in traffic_server that it seems bogus to require building and running it to do the tests. If you're in a tight edit/compile/test cycle it's nice to not have to drag in everything else. On Wednesday, May 24, 2017, 4:38:08 P

Re: Unit Test Framework

I am in favor of using GTest for unit testing. There is a lot of documentation and support for it. I would rely on the OS's GTest install and test for it in autoconf. autest should be used for integration testing and tsqa will be removed, so people don’t accidentally write tests for it. -Bry

Re: Unit Test Framework

> On May 24, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Alan Carroll > wrote: > > Even though I wrote TestBox I think we need to migrate away from it. It's big > flaw is it is built to support regression tests which means using it involves > bringing up the traffic_server process. That's much more heavy weight than

Re: Unit Test Framework

Even though I wrote TestBox I think we need to migrate away from it. It's big flaw is it is built to support regression tests which means using it involves bringing up the traffic_server process. That's much more heavy weight than a good unit test framework should be. Real unit testing should lo

Re: Unit Test Framework

> Do we want to stick with the “make check/TestBox”? > Based on what I have seen so far on this thread looks like people generally like GTest. Any more ideas or suggestions? Do we drop the GTest idea? I wrote some simple unit tests for HTTP/2 related stuff with TestBox and actually I have some for