Re: Last call: any PRs for 7.1.0 release?

> On Apr 27, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > >> On Apr 27, 2017, at 8:37 AM, Chao Xu wrote: >> >> Hi Leif, >> >> I think that you forgot to revert this. >> >> commit 1450456d609fa37a0b831717dc826c5e759dafe9 >> Author: Leif Hedstrom >> Date: Wed Apr 12 15:21:08 2017 -0700 >>

Re: Last call: any PRs for 7.1.0 release?

> On Apr 27, 2017, at 8:37 AM, Chao Xu wrote: > > Hi Leif, > > I think that you forgot to revert this. > > commit 1450456d609fa37a0b831717dc826c5e759dafe9 > Author: Leif Hedstrom > Date: Wed Apr 12 15:21:08 2017 -0700 > >Revert "TS-4895: Initialize default_inactivity_timeout (CID 10217

Re: Is ATS 5.3.2 affected by CVE-2017-5659

I couldn’t get it to crash on ATS 5.3.x myself. I am seeing this in the squid logs after the request: 1493308994.894 56 216.161.80.88 ERR_CLIENT_ABORT 000 0 POST … -Bryan > On Apr 27, 2017, at 8:18 AM, Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan) > wrote: > > Hi, > > I know ATS 5.3.2 may be end of support. But

Is ATS 5.3.2 affected by CVE-2017-5659

Hi, I know ATS 5.3.2 may be end of support. But it would be very appreciated if someone can suggest if 5.3.2 is affected by CVE-2017-5659. Currently we are still using 5.3.2 in production, and want to evaluate how to back port CVE-2017-5659 to 5.3.2 by ourselves. However, looks like the code b

Re: Last call: any PRs for 7.1.0 release?

Hi Leif, I think that you forgot to revert this. commit 1450456d609fa37a0b831717dc826c5e759dafe9 Author: Leif Hedstrom Date: Wed Apr 12 15:21:08 2017 -0700 Revert "TS-4895: Initialize default_inactivity_timeout (CID 1021743 from TS-4612)" This reverts commit 9108bc942d1f0d141ec3de008