Github user yatsukhnenko commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/615#issuecomment-218671191
There is no Jira for this PR and I can't create new issue :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/630#issuecomment-218635305
Linux (CentOS7) build finished successfully. Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/21/
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
GitHub user shinrich opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/630
TS-4435: Enable compilation with openssl 1.1
Openssl 1.1 removes the locking and thread id callbacks. It deduces system
you are on and uses the appropriate threading interface.
Ope
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/615#issuecomment-218620870
Also, would you mind adding the Jira number to the Subject line to this
commit / PR? It helps us associate the PR with the correct Jira.
---
If your project is set
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/629#issuecomment-218621761
Linux (CentOS7) build finished successfully. Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/20/
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
GitHub user shinrich opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/629
TS-4309: Simplify read/write loops to address upload/download speed pâ¦
â¦roblems.
May also help with ASAN crash reported in TS-4424.
You can merge this pull request into a Git re
Github user shinrich closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user shinrich commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218620277
Wasn't working on the latest greatest when creating this branch. Closing
this PR and opening a new one on a new branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/628#issuecomment-218617861
Linux (CentOS7) build finished successfully. Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/19/
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/628#issuecomment-218616131
Ok, I fixed the build issue I think (out of memory), kicking off a new
build. [approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/628#issuecomment-218615012
Linux (CentOS7) build failed! Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/18/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/568#issuecomment-218614205
Linux (CentOS7) build finished successfully. Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/17/
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/628#issuecomment-218614105
Sigh, the build terminated with the Jenkins agent taking a dive it seems...
Try again. [approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/628#issuecomment-218613456
Linux (CentOS7) build failed! Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/16/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218612986
Linux (CentOS7) build finished successfully. Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/15/
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
GitHub user SolidWallOfCode opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/628
TS-4032: Enable command line based message passing to plugins.
This is the second round after PR-343. I made the RPC unpacking changes HRP
recommended. Why they didn't compile before
Github user SolidWallOfCode commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/343#issuecomment-218612497
I changed the RPC unpacking to use the standard mechanism. I don't know why
it didn't compile before and I don't the energy to figure it out.
---
If your
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/568#issuecomment-218612393
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218610786
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/571#issuecomment-218591913
Linux (CentOS7) build finished successfully. Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/14/
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user jpeach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/571#issuecomment-218588544
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user jpeach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/571#issuecomment-218586966
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user jpeach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/210#issuecomment-218585959
Sure either way is fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/613
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/620
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/611#issuecomment-218582907
Linux (CentOS7) build finished successfully. Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/13/
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user jpeach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/625#issuecomment-218582035
Thanks @oknet
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/625
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/228
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/228#issuecomment-218581467
I'm going to close this, it doesn't look right to me, not sure if we'll see
a new PR soon?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/565
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/565#issuecomment-218580928
Merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/565#issuecomment-218580181
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/593#issuecomment-218578787
Linux (CentOS7) build finished successfully. Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/12/
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/611#issuecomment-218578478
Try another build: [approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/611#issuecomment-218577287
Linux (CentOS7) build failed! Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/11/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/593#issuecomment-218576777
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/611#issuecomment-218576316
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/613#issuecomment-218569956
Linux (CentOS7) build finished successfully. Details on
https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/10/
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/613#issuecomment-218567588
Started Linux (CentOS7) build.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/613#issuecomment-218567359
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
At the ATS Summit in Vancouver, we had a brief discussion about each the
experimental plugins for the upcoming 7.0 release. In the room, the consensus
was:
- Move to stable (eg, used, and unlikely to be breaking compatibility in the
short term):authproxybackground_fetchesigeneratorregex_revalida
Github user myraid commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/408#issuecomment-218546235
I have to write an example test using the mocks. Let me use webp_transform
and write a test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user shinrich commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218545767
I probably forgot to run clang format on it. Will clang-format and push
again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218546571
Yep, no problem. I just used this PR to test the new automated Jenkins
builds :-).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/625#issuecomment-218544819
Build finished successfully.
No test results found.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218541919
This build failed, please check Jenkins for details.
No test results found.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/625#issuecomment-218541607
Build triggered. sha1 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218541604
Build triggered. sha1 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/625#issuecomment-218540994
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218538166
Hmmm, so, this build failed with wrong clang-format, I'll investigate how
to get it to produce proper errors.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218537713
Build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218537364
Build triggered. sha1 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218537407
Build started sha1 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218537302
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user oschaaf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/210#issuecomment-218528146
The patch looks good to me, but @jpeach had an improvement in mind. @jpeach
would you be OK with committing this and doing
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/620#issuecomment-218525931
Build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/620#issuecomment-218525626
Build started sha1 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/615#issuecomment-218525606
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/502#issuecomment-218525666
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/35#issuecomment-218525721
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/568#issuecomment-218525646
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/588#issuecomment-218525638
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/228#issuecomment-218525695
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/611#issuecomment-218525622
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/199#issuecomment-218525707
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/565#issuecomment-218525655
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/210#issuecomment-218525702
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/262#issuecomment-218525691
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/310#issuecomment-218525685
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/123#issuecomment-218525716
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/408#issuecomment-218525676
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/536#issuecomment-218525659
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/571#issuecomment-218525641
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/598#issuecomment-218525630
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/618#issuecomment-218525599
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/613#issuecomment-218525617
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/624#issuecomment-218525564
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/627#issuecomment-218525551
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/620#issuecomment-218525594
Build triggered. sha1 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user atsci commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/625#issuecomment-218525556
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user jpeach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/626#issuecomment-218517477
Thanks @oknet. I split the error condition so we could log separate debug
messages.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/620#issuecomment-218517598
Testing a little, so be nice. [approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/626
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
84 matches
Mail list logo
