SSL decryption in forward proxy mode

2016-03-29 Thread Karthik Sivaraman
Hi Is there any existing support for SSL decryption in forward proxy mode of trafficserver? I could not find any documentation around this. We want to scan all traffic that emanate from our network. The only relevant feature I found was SSL termination for reverse proxy mode but it was not c

Re: [HEADSUP] clang-format updates

2016-03-29 Thread James Peach
> On Mar 29, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > Hi, > > as part of the 6.2.0 branching, and moving unto the 7.0.0 development train, > I’d like to update the clang-format binary packages that we use. I will > produce all these packages soon, but it’s important that we switch packages

[HEADSUP] clang-format updates

2016-03-29 Thread Leif Hedstrom
Hi, as part of the 6.2.0 branching, and moving unto the 7.0.0 development train, I’d like to update the clang-format binary packages that we use. I will produce all these packages soon, but it’s important that we switch packages at the same time (although if you use the fancy script Peach wrote

Re: ATS Release Branch 4.2.x EOL

2016-03-29 Thread Sudheer Vinukonda
+1 PS: Beg Pardon in advance, in case my email formatting gets messed up again! On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 9:32 AM, Phil Sorber wrote: Hopefully this doesn't come as a shock to anyone, but we need to EOL the 4.2.x release branch. 4.2.0 was released on March 19th 2014 according to the STA

Re: ATS Release Branch 4.2.x EOL

2016-03-29 Thread Theo Schlossnagle
+1 > On Mar 29, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Phil Sorber wrote: > > Hopefully this doesn't come as a shock to anyone, but we need to EOL the > 4.2.x release branch. 4.2.0 was released on March 19th 2014 according to > the STATUS file. Originally we discussed 1 year timespan, but then extended > it to 1.5

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: AARCH64 fixes tested on Cavium Thunder...

2016-03-29 Thread PSUdaemon
Github user PSUdaemon commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/502#issuecomment-202990616 This kinda feels like it should be three separate PR's. f304c50a2c00d7d711015c981b2007dacdf159b7 - seems probably ok, simply because if it's wrong it wo

Re: ATS Release Branch 4.2.x EOL

2016-03-29 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Mar 29, 2016, at 10:31 AM, Phil Sorber wrote: > > Hopefully this doesn't come as a shock to anyone, but we need to EOL the > 4.2.x release branch. 4.2.0 was released on March 19th 2014 according to > the STATUS file. Originally we discussed 1 year timespan, but then extended > it to 1.5 yea

ATS Release Branch 4.2.x EOL

2016-03-29 Thread Phil Sorber
Hopefully this doesn't come as a shock to anyone, but we need to EOL the 4.2.x release branch. 4.2.0 was released on March 19th 2014 according to the STATUS file. Originally we discussed 1 year timespan, but then extended it to 1.5 years. That puts us at September 19th 2015. So technically we are a