Not really sure..perhaps, you may try turning on debug (tags: http, url_remap)
and check the logs to get more clues.
Thanks,
Sudheer
On Thursday, March 10, 2016, 7:13 PM, Dk Jack wrote:
Sudheer,Any other suggestions I can try? Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Dk Jack wrote:
There i
Sudheer,
Any other suggestions I can try? Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Dk Jack wrote:
> There is no remap rule, since this is internally generated
> traffic TSSkipRemappingSet is set.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Sudheer Vinukonda <
> sudhe...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote:
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/521
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/521#issuecomment-195107210
Ok. So we'll leave 6.x unusable for now. :). I understand you primary
concern, that it hides possibly another problem. But your r->round_robin
argument doesn't make
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/521#issuecomment-195071103
I don't think this should land. If you look above there is already a check
if the item is round robin (`if (r->round_robin) {`) so this check would
basically ju
Github user zwoop commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/521#issuecomment-195044366
Should I land this? I understand it might hide an underlying problem, but
a) it does work and b) it does make sense to check the rr, we do that in other
places too.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/522
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
