Re: trafficserver git commit: TS-3928: Make TSRemapNewInstance not required in remap plugins

2015-09-21 Thread James Peach
Phil, can you please update the man page for TSRemapNewInstance? https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/reference/api/TSRemap.en.html thanks! > On Sep 21, 2015, at 1:14 PM, sor...@apache.org wrote: > > Repository: trafficserver > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 0a58767f7 -> 9043

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 (RC3)

2015-09-21 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Sep 16, 2015, at 4:03 PM, Jason Strongman > wrote: > > In 5.3.0 the below works. However, seems to be broken in other > releases. Including this one. > > # /opt/trafficserver60rc3/bin/traffic_ctl -V > Apache Traffic Server - traffic_ctl - 6.0.0 - (build # 091616 on Sep > 16 2015 at 16:49:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 is Released!

2015-09-21 Thread Bryan Call
Apache Traffic Server v6.0.0 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Traffic Server project are pleased to announce the release of Apache Traffic Server v6.0.0! This release immediately available for download at: http://trafficserver.apache.org/downloads When upgrad

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 (RC3)

2015-09-21 Thread Bryan Call
The vote passed 3 +1 binding votes. -Bryan > On Sep 16, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > +1 - Been running in production and it has been pretty stable, compiled with > asan. It is getting a daily average of 1K rps or 86.4 million requests per > day. > > -Bryan > >> On Sep 14, 2015,

Re: tsqa is disabled on our CI as of now

2015-09-21 Thread Phil Sorber
I get that it is technically fixable, but if we can't seem to accomplish it as a group I categorize that as not fixable. I think this feature requires more shepherding. "Hey Phil, your test is broken. Do you need pointers for fixing it?" Think of Zwoop when clang-format is busted or a new Coverity

Re: tsqa is disabled on our CI as of now

2015-09-21 Thread Thomas Jackson
I'll repeat again, lint is fixable-- people just need to fix their test code to pass those tests. I'm thinking we should just remove the broader list, and just email the people that break the tests going forward. This way we can still (hopefully) clean them up without spamming everyone to death.

Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: tsqa-master #878

2015-09-21 Thread Phil Sorber
Thomas, Can you explain what happened here? It also looks like it fixed itself in build #879 but I don't see what fixed it. Thanks. -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:32 PM Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: tsqa-master #878 To: , , < shinr...@network-geogr

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: [TS-3911] New log tag for proxy connec...

2015-09-21 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/293 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: Cache range requests changes

2015-09-21 Thread sudheerv
Github user sudheerv commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/298#issuecomment-142013274 lgtm. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: Cache range requests changes

2015-09-21 Thread jrushf1239k
GitHub user jrushf1239k opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/298 Cache range requests changes logging changes suggested by jpeach. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/jrushf1239k/traffics

Re: tsqa is disabled on our CI as of now

2015-09-21 Thread Phil Sorber
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:04 AM Thomas Jackson wrote: > Tsqa-lint is intended to pass, but if no one ever looks at the mails then > they never get better. > On Sep 18, 2015 6:34 PM, "Leif Hedstrom" wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Thomas Jackson > > wrote: > > > > > > *TL;DR: if

Re: tsqa is disabled on our CI as of now

2015-09-21 Thread Thomas Jackson
Tsqa-lint is intended to pass, but if no one ever looks at the mails then they never get better. On Sep 18, 2015 6:34 PM, "Leif Hedstrom" wrote: > > > On Sep 18, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Thomas Jackson > wrote: > > > > *TL;DR: if you make a commit, and the tests fail-- there is a high > > probability t

Re: active timeouts broken

2015-09-21 Thread Brian Geffon
I'm suspecting: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=trafficserver.git;a=commitdiff;h=974e8e3abc9a3f60f516b24302edde5618a3cfc5 from TS-3313: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3313 Brian On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Brian Geffon wrote: > All, > While adding new websocket specific

active timeouts broken

2015-09-21 Thread Brian Geffon
All, While adding new websocket specific timeouts it seems that active timeouts are completely broken on master. I quickly tested and verified that they are working properly as of 5.2.x (which is the branch we're on over here), so somewhere since then a huge regression was introduced...does anyone