The stream-editor plugin was developed and tested against TS 5.2.x.
Against trunk, it builds just fine, but I've only just tried to run it,
and I'm getting a crash from a completely unexpected place: a malloc
under TSContCreate. The dump is:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
m
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/257#issuecomment-124564250
@bgaff Wouldn't this be better implemented as an overrideable config for
body factory root? In a lot of cases remap's domain is a regex (at least for
us), so th
I agree with Leif as well - the "cost" in constantly reshuffling VC's across
threads may outweigh the extra latency in using per-thread pool. If we do not
want cross-thread communication, it seems like using per-thread pool is a more
cleaner solution. Would it makes sense to spend time to invest
It's unclear to me that you wouldn't get better NUMA affinity with the
migration. The logic spends much more time messing with the IOBuffers than with
the socket buffers and if the socket is migrated the IOBuffers will be thread
local whereas currently they are not. That is, IOBuffers for server
On 7/24/2015 2:11 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On Jul 24, 2015, at 3:16 AM, Susan Hinrichs
wrote:
Hello,
Another latent cross-thread race condition has become very active in our
environment (TS-3797). Given that we just spent time within the last month
squashing another cross thread race con
> On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:11 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 3:16 AM, Susan Hinrichs
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Another latent cross-thread race condition has become very active in our
>>> environment
> On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:11 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 3:16 AM, Susan Hinrichs
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Another latent cross-thread race condition has become very active in our
>> environment (TS-3797). Given that we just spent time within the last month
>> s
> On Jul 24, 2015, at 3:16 AM, Susan Hinrichs
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Another latent cross-thread race condition has become very active in our
> environment (TS-3797). Given that we just spent time within the last month
> squashing another cross thread race condition (TS-3486) that was acti
