Github user ffcai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/216#issuecomment-112654624
Thanks @bryancall ! It's needed for server intercept.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user PSUdaemon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/161#issuecomment-112621657
Interim cache has been removed as of 6.0.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user PSUdaemon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/225#issuecomment-112621262
Sorry, I forgot to add the "this closes" part. @cjqian, can you close this
please?
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:54 PM Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I started this slide show with some ideas how we can solve the “90%” of
> the problem (i.e. making all plugins reloadable, both code and configs).
> See the link at
>
>
> https://www.icloud.com/keynote/AwBUCAESENdl8ooGRL1RjGFpC0Jt
Hi all,
I started this slide show with some ideas how we can solve the “90%” of the
problem (i.e. making all plugins reloadable, both code and configs). See the
link at
https://www.icloud.com/keynote/AwBUCAESENdl8ooGRL1RjGFpC0Jt03saKd2FE7OokWOx4mDdeu2WkoGhPN-GT6KxDq0Sk01DmcUHUWsF7og8i8kJMCUCAQE
GitHub user danobi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/227
TS-3694: Fix outdated Log::error documentation
Comment for function did not reflect code.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/d
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/215
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:07 PM Brian Geffon wrote:
> I like the idea of CK++, I'd love to see this, my only question is: who is
> officially going to be the maintainer of CK++, will it be the CK community?
> Also, would CK++ require C++11/14 or would it try to be backwards
> compatible with olde
I like the idea of CK++, I'd love to see this, my only question is: who is
officially going to be the maintainer of CK++, will it be the CK community?
Also, would CK++ require C++11/14 or would it try to be backwards
compatible with older versions of C++?
Brian
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:57 AM, P
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:19 PM Alan Carroll
wrote:
> During the 6.0 bug scrub / planning session there was a lot of discussion
> of Concurrency Kit (libck). The fundamental issue is that CK does not
> compile in a C++ environment and cannot be made to do so without
> significant and incompatib
During the 6.0 bug scrub / planning session there was a lot of discussion of
Concurrency Kit (libck). The fundamental issue is that CK does not compile in a
C++ environment and cannot be made to do so without significant and
incompatible API changes. This is also true for the header files which
GitHub user voondo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/226
rc script : gentoo support
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/quarkstudio/trafficserver gentoo-support
Alternatively you can
12 matches
Mail list logo
