Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/189#issuecomment-98012180
@zeb209 Per our offline discussion we can add the tests for assigning a key
out of the middle later. Before we merge this in though, can you do a git mv
and a sq
Github user jacksontj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/192#issuecomment-98012067
@ffcai Assuming the tests still pass that should be fine :)
I just finished replacing the old tsqa-- so sadly you now have a merge
conflict :(
---
If
I'm not sure I'd believe a plugin was ready to be moved out of experimental if
it doesn't have a documentation page (eg, other than a README in the code
directory, though the doc page wouldn't have to have different content).miles
On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 9:15 PM, Steven Hunter
wrote:
Stable_connection/
StevenHunter
On Apr 24, 2015 11:09 AM, "Leif Hedstrom" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Below is a list of currently “experimental” plugins. We should decide
which, if any, of these should be moved to a stable state. Once stable,
incompatible changes within a major release would not be a
Github user sudheerv commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/194#issuecomment-97845539
I agree with @jpeach on the TCP_INFO usage. Are the TCP_INFO traces even
part of the wire trace feature? Besides being non-portable, isn't there also
(significant
Github user jpeach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/194#issuecomment-97840771
I only looked quickly, but just a couple of points. The use of ``TCP_INFO``
is non-portable so this feature will need to be conditional. Why would we have
our own t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/195
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
