I forgot to mention that I +1 this release in my previous email.
Brian
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> > On Dec 16, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Leif Hedstrom > wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've prepared a release candidate for v5.2.0, which is primarily a bug
> fix release ov
> On Dec 16, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've prepared a release candidate for v5.2.0, which is primarily a bug fix
> release over v5.1.x, but also adds a few noteworthy features:
>
>* TLS dynamic record sizing
>* Add forward secrecy support with DHE
>*
> On Dec 17, 2014, at 8:24 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 17, 2014, at 9:18 AM, James Peach wrote:
>>
>> Does this mean that all our CI builds now use --enable-reclaimable-freelist?
>
>
> No, only 2 of them. I didn’t want to do it for everything, because this is
> the “uncommon” pa
Build success on Centos 6 x86_64 ,with TS-3178. Works four hours
Vote +1
> 在 2014年12月17日，14:53，Brian Geffon 写道：
>
> Fixed in master with commit 8993142d44253ded76b132535b6886f971483b9f. I've
> verified the build on CentOS 6 w/ gcc 4.9.2 all regressions also pass.
>
> Brian
>
> On Tue, Dec 16
> On Dec 17, 2014, at 9:18 AM, James Peach wrote:
>
> Does this mean that all our CI builds now use --enable-reclaimable-freelist?
No, only 2 of them. I didn’t want to do it for everything, because this is the
“uncommon” path.
— Leif
Does this mean that all our CI builds now use --enable-reclaimable-freelist?
> On Dec 17, 2014, at 7:07 AM, zw...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Repository: trafficserver
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master 8993142d4 -> 76db63d70
>
>
> Enable a few more options for the base build
>
>
> Project:
