> On Nov 4, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
>
> This should be self explanatory and IMO we should land for 5.2, the
> following patch is also attached to TS-1432.
I obviously haven’t tested it, but seems straightforward and useful.
+1
— leif
Adding Wez
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Phil Sorber wrote:
> 12:18 < sbahra> how about you kick off an e-mail to me and we discuss over
> e-mail?
> 12:18 < sbahra> Well, the real limitation is that testing overhead is high.
> 12:19 < sbahra> I was thinking, if we invest some time to automate
12:18 < sbahra> how about you kick off an e-mail to me and we discuss over
e-mail?
12:18 < sbahra> Well, the real limitation is that testing overhead is high.
12:19 < sbahra> I was thinking, if we invest some time to automate a lot of
the testing then it would be feasible.
12:20 < sbahra> Right now
> On Nov 4, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
>
> This should be self explanatory and IMO we should land for 5.2, the
> following patch is also attached to TS-1432.
+1 on the API
For the implementation, I think you should take reference counting into
account. Maybe something along these l
