This should be self explanatory and IMO we should land for 5.2, the
following patch is also attached to TS-1432.
Brian
diff --git a/proxy/InkIOCoreAPI.cc b/proxy/InkIOCoreAPI.cc
index 26f3298..091d7a2 100644
--- a/proxy/InkIOCoreAPI.cc
+++ b/proxy/InkIOCoreAPI.cc
@@ -189,6 +189,11 @@ TSMutexCre
Brian,
Just some thoughts on collaboration. Most of the contributors are local is
definite something advantage we can take. Since it’s a framework, we
probably need some initial meetings/phone calls to come up with a robust
easy-to-use framework. After that, we can start to implement test cases
in
Hi Alan,
Sure - but, unfortunately, it looks like there¹s something wrong with the
automatic propagation of the commit SHA onto the jira for the past few
days.
It¹s not been updating the commit SHA on the jira, despite mentioning the
jira ticket # in the commit message.
Thanks,
Sudheer
On 11/4
Monday, November 3, 2014, 2:57:00 PM, you wrote:
> This change is part of TS-2683 - I will try to update the CHANGES file
> with a consolidated list of changes made for TS-2683. Will that work?
If you could, also put the commit SHA in a comment on the ticket. That's very
useful later on. This ha
Brian,
Agree with Josh. You have captured the requirements well.
AFAICT, most of the contributors are local - LinkedIn, Apple and Yahoo.
Phone call, irc is all good. We can even meet to nail this.
Thanks,
Narayan
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Brian Geffon wrote:
> Hi All, thanks for your
Hi Brian,
This is a nice overview. I think you've captured the requirements nicely.
The only change I'd suggest is that it'd be nice to turn the functional test
framework into a lightweight load test because some issues will only be seen
under load. This wouldn't be able to hammer ATS
Hi All, thanks for your patience I know many people are eager to start
pooling resources to make this happen. (Thanks Susan for helping with notes
during the summit)
To briefly summarize what was discussed at the summit, we have an existing
framework called TSQA which is based on bash, while this
Sorry guys I've been traveling and haven't had the chance to start the
discussions on this. We more or less have our requirements as gathered at
the summit I'll try to send them out today so we can begin discussing a
roadmap.
Brian
On Monday, November 3, 2014, Joshua Blatt
wrote:
> Good feedbac
