On Sep 19, 2014, at 3:09 PM, Alan M. Carroll
wrote:
> TSHttpHdrHostGet
> ==
>
> Synopsis
>
>
> `#include `
>
> .. c:function:: const char* TSHttpHdrHostGet(TSMBuffer bufp, TSMLoc offset,
> int *length)
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> Get the host for the reque
TSHttpHdrHostGet
==
Synopsis
`#include `
.. c:function:: const char* TSHttpHdrHostGet(TSMBuffer bufp, TSMLoc offset, int
*length)
Description
---
Get the host for the request. :arg:`bufp` and :arg:`offset` must reference an
HTTP request header. A pointer to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/107
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Brian Rectanus wrote:
> This is a followup on the API review I posted earlier. I got quite a bit
> of feedback (thanks for that) and want to summarize and verify I understood
> comments correctly. I don't think there were any -1s for the existing pull
> request, but
This is a followup on the API review I posted earlier. I got quite a bit
of feedback (thanks for that) and want to summarize and verify I understood
comments correctly. I don't think there were any -1s for the existing pull
request, but just some recommendations on how this could be improved.
Thi
Now that 5.1.0 is released, you can request backports from master to 5.1.x for
5.1.1. Such requests should be for serious, "must have" fixes for the
community. As usual, no JIRA ticket, no backport. The fix must already exist,
be committed to master, and tested. To be clear, no fixes will be dir
On Sep 19, 2014, at 8:38 AM, Alan M. Carroll
wrote:
> Friday, September 19, 2014, 10:12:29 AM, you wrote:
>
>
>>> + sni_servername.release(); // otherwise we'll free the source string.
>
>
>> Why don't you want to free the source string in this case?
>
> Because it's still in the sourc
Friday, September 19, 2014, 10:12:29 AM, you wrote:
>> + sni_servername.release(); // otherwise we'll free the source string.
> Why don't you want to free the source string in this case?
Because it's still in the source object and therefore it would be freed again
at some point in the fut
On Sep 19, 2014, at 6:30 AM, a...@apache.org wrote:
> Repository: trafficserver
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master a9905459d -> 4a143e584
>
>
> TS-2802: Additional fixups.
> Changed NetVCOptions to use ats_scoped_str instead of a raw pointer.
> Added comments.
>
>
> Proj
