Luca,
Monday, September 1, 2014, 1:49:13 PM, you wrote:
> You can also choose to store it in cache and delete dupe in a second moment.
You could, but once you've written to cache, you have advanced the write
cursor. Deleting the duplicate later has no effect except changing a directory
entry.
You can also choose to store it in cache and delete dupe in a second moment.
I assume the idea would be to not write to the cache until you have decided it
is not a dupe? Which would imply, buffering it somewhere which does not move
the write header forward.
-- Leif
> On Sep 1, 2014, at 9:55 AM, Luca Rea wrote:
>
> Can it help to keep only the useful cache and limit
Can it help to keep only the useful cache and limit the recycle process?
Rasim,
Monday, September 1, 2014, 10:22:06 AM, you wrote:
> Looks like it is not feasible/possible to remove URL hash map solution
> completely.. However, storage optimization was another topic in our mind,
> which content hash can save the day. We are thinking this can be a nice
> feature if
Hi All,
Thanks for your kind replies.
Looks like it is not feasible/possible to remove URL hash map solution
completely.. However, storage optimization was another topic in our mind, which
content hash can save the day. We are thinking this can be a nice feature if
implemented. If anybody dec
