Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 4.2.1 (RC0)

2014-04-14 Thread Adam W. Dace
+1 Builds just fine on Mac OS X v10.9.2. On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Phil Sorber wrote: > Hello All, > > I've prepared a release for v4.2.1 (RC0) which is the latest stable release > in the 4.2.x series. This is the second release in our Long Term Support > (LTS) version as detailed in ou

Re: ATS 4.2.0 crashing

2014-04-14 Thread Brendan Webb
Awesome. Let me know if I can do anything on my end to help track it down. On 4/14/14, 2:39 PM, "Alan M. Carroll" wrote: >Brendan, > >This might be TS-2564. I'm currently investigating another crash that >seems related. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 4.2.1 (RC0)

2014-04-14 Thread Thomas Jackson
+1 Builds in my environment and passes some basic smoke tests :) On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Phil Sorber wrote: > Hello All, > > I've prepared a release for v4.2.1 (RC0) which is the latest stable release > in the 4.2.x series. This is the second release in our Long Term Support > (LTS) v

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server 4.2.1 (RC0)

2014-04-14 Thread Brian Geffon
+1 on RHEL6.4 On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Phil Sorber wrote: > Hello All, > > I've prepared a release for v4.2.1 (RC0) which is the latest stable release > in the 4.2.x series. This is the second release in our Long Term Support > (LTS) version as detailed in our Release Management documen

Re: ATS 4.2.0 crashing

2014-04-14 Thread Alan M. Carroll
Brendan, This might be TS-2564. I'm currently investigating another crash that seems related.

ATS 4.2.0 crashing

2014-04-14 Thread Brendan Webb
After upgrading from 3.0.4 to 4.2.0, ATS is crashing quite frequently on me. Anyone seeing similar crashes? traffic.out [E. Mgmt] log ==> [TrafficManager] using root directory '/app00/trafficserver' [TrafficServer] using root directory '/app00/trafficserver' FATAL: InkAPI.cc:2669: failed assert `

Re: Proposed partial object caching design

2014-04-14 Thread Alan M. Carroll
See inline. Monday, April 14, 2014, 10:02:22 AM, you wrote: > That looks really good, there are lots of complicated issues to get this > stuff right. Yes, but Leif will be helping so it's all good. > Which header differences between one range fetch and the next invalidate all > of the old fra

Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.

2014-04-14 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On Apr 14, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> >> On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Justin Erenkrantz >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Yongming Zhao wrote: well, does that affect the ARM platform? >>> >>> ARMv6 (Raspberry Pi) and AR

RE: Proposed partial object caching design

2014-04-14 Thread Bardwell, William
That looks really good, there are lots of complicated issues to get this stuff right. Which header differences between one range fetch and the next invalidate all of the old fragments, when should they just update the response headers. What is the right range/partial object chunk size. (Should be

Re: Proposal to remove 32bit support.

2014-04-14 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > > On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Justin Erenkrantz > wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Yongming Zhao wrote: > >> well, does that affect the ARM platform? > > > > ARMv6 (Raspberry Pi) and ARMv7 is 32-bit, but ARMv8 is 64-bit. If > > someone is runni