On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:28:08AM -0800, James Peach wrote:
> I'm not very comfortable with this change. I don't think it fixes anything
> and I don't think that we have a good idea on how this affects distributions
> and end users. I'm perfectly happy with preferring libedit to libreadline,
On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:24 PM, bc...@apache.org wrote:
>
> + *) [TS-2370] SSL proxy.config.ssl.server.honor_cipher_order is backwards.
> + Changed the default setting and changed the meaning of it in the code.
> +
> *) [TS-2466] NOT increase the version of records.config when changing
Is this
Is there a problem with tagging the last rc version with the actual
released version when you release?
That is, part of the release process being:
git tag -s 4.1.2 4.1.2-rc0
If 4.1.2-rc0 is signed and trusted, then creating another tag off this
seems fine.
-B
--
Brian Rectanus | brecta...@qual
On Jan 6, 2014, at 1:22 PM, Otto van der Schaaf wrote:
> Perhaps some of the performance loss you are seeing might be caused by ATS
> having to switch to a chunked transfer encoding when a transform is
> involved.
> What does cpu usage look like with and without a transform on your system?
+1. I
- Original Message -
> I sent this previously, but as a reply to the announcement which may have
> gotten filtered...
>
> Please, can someone tag 4.1.2 in git? There is only a 4.1.2-rc0, currently.
>
4.1.2-rc0 was released as 4.1.2
I didn't re-tag it, because it would have created a
Hi Leif, James and all,
Happy new year! Hope everyone had a great holiday.
Just want to see if anyone had a chance to take a look of this issue. For
whatever unknown reason to me, the problem seems no happening any more
with exactly same configuration.
Does anyone can think of anything what cou
Perhaps some of the performance loss you are seeing might be caused by ATS
having to switch to a chunked transfer encoding when a transform is
involved.
What does cpu usage look like with and without a transform on your system?
Regards,
Otto
2014/1/6 Uri Shachar
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:59:46
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:59:46 +0200 Roee Gil wrote
> Subject: Null transform slow down connection
snip
> I'm trying to understand what are the trade off when I use transform.
> so I did a speed test at this site: http://www.speedtest.net/
>
> and checked it without ATS, with ATS with no plugins and f
On Jan 5, 2014, at 6:45 PM, z...@apache.org wrote:
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master daa10ebce -> 3b2b2afc7
>
>
> TS-2235: two functions should be changed too
>
> to be changed functions:
> url_length_get()
> url_to_string()
It should be straight forward to write a regression test f
On Jan 6, 2014, at 1:06 AM, z...@apache.org wrote:
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master 024db4624 -> 3344fdfc7
>
>
> TS-2469: remove libreadline which is gpl licensed
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Yongming
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/repo
> Commit: http:
Hi all,
I'm trying to understand what are the trade off when I use transform.
so I did a speed test at this site: http://www.speedtest.net/
and checked it without ATS, with ATS with no plugins and finally ATS with
null transform plugin.
between with and without ATS, I had not change at all, but
I sent this previously, but as a reply to the announcement which may have
gotten filtered...
Please, can someone tag 4.1.2 in git? There is only a 4.1.2-rc0, currently.
Cheers!
-B
--
Brian Rectanus | brecta...@qualys.com
12 matches
Mail list logo