v3.2 have some broken Range codes changed by amc, which is fixed in the
master later. in our own 3.2 tree, we have reverted the changes in
Range, TS-475 TS-1265
FYI
在 2012-10-12五的 15:10 -0600，Leif Hedstrom写道：
> On 10/12/12 3:07 PM, Eagen, Dave wrote:
> > Yes, 3.2.3 crashed when we tried it with l
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:16 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
> That looks perfectly reasonable. What does webint.example.net resolve to on
> the client? Can you show me the result of "curl -v -v"?
>
After running the output trough "sed 's/readldomain/example.net/g'".
All names are in public dns, and c
On Oct 11, 2012, at 11:57 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:53 AM, James Peach wrote:
>
>>
>> What's your SSL configuration look like? What are your certificates?
>>
That looks perfectly reasonable. What does webint.example.net resolve to on the
client? Can you sho
On 10/12/12 1:27 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
y.config.ssl.client.CA.cert.filename STRING NULL
CONFIG proxy.config.ssl.client.CA.cert.path STRING /etc/trafficserver
-jf
The vote ends today, and we've got two reported issues:
`make test` failing on Linux, and this SSL issue.
Does someone know wh
+1, compiled successful, pass remap rule with regex, pass ip_allow and deny
rule, caching works ok. Not sure how is it going when running for long
enough timescale.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:53 AM, ming@gmail.com wrote:
>
> my buildbot get the following fail when I building the 3.2.x tree:
my buildbot get the following fail when I building the 3.2.x tree:
> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> Vec.h: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’:
> Vec.h:616: error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that
> (X + c) < X is always false
> Vec.h:616: error: assuming s
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:53 AM, James Peach
> wrote:
>
> >
> > What's your SSL configuration look like? What are your
> > certificates?
> >
>
> ssl_multicert.config:
>
> dest_ip=81.167.37.99
> ssl_cert_name=/etc/pki/tls/certs/star.webint.example.no.crt
> ssl_k
Yes, I get that too. It's `make test` failing.
I'm a bit concrened about that too: Distros
don't like to have failing tests. Interestingly
it didn't fail on Solaris for me.
i
- Original Message -
>
> my buildbot get the following fail when I building the 3.2.x tree:
>
>
> > cc1plus: w
