> >
> > Please cast your ±1/0 votes. Voting closes Sun Jul 22 01:20:11 UTC
> > 2012
>
> I'd like to add https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1363 since
> it's a regression from 3.0; I'll do the backporting in a few hours
+1
> J
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.ga...@brains
On 18/07/2012, at 6:21 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I uploaded a new tar ball to
>
> http://people.apache.org/~igalic/releases/
>
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 igalic igalic 2532024 Jul 19 02:23
> trafficserver-3.2.1.tar.bz2
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 igalic igalic 836 Jul 19 02:23
> traffics
Hi folks,
I uploaded a new tar ball to
http://people.apache.org/~igalic/releases/
-rw-rw-r-- 1 igalic igalic 2532024 Jul 19 02:23 trafficserver-3.2.1.tar.bz2
-rw-rw-r-- 1 igalic igalic 836 Jul 19 02:23
trafficserver-3.2.1.tar.bz2.asc
-rw-rw-r-- 1 igalic igalic 62 Jul 19
On Jul 18, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 7/18/12 11:43 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
>>
For these regression tests is it a release requirement that they fully
pass? ie should they pass cleanly when run against the current 3.2.0
release?
>>>
>>> Yep. They only pas
On 7/18/12 11:43 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
For these regression tests is it a release requirement that they
fully pass? ie should they pass cleanly when run against the
current 3.2.0 release?
Yep. They only pass with the default configs though, so have to make
a fresh install and run the re
On 7/18/12 11:03 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 7/18/12 10:45 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
On 7/18/12 10:32 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 7/18/12 8:56 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
I'm looking to do make some changes to ATS in addition to doing some work
on a plugin, and generally have a preference to to have u
On 7/18/12 10:45 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
On 7/18/12 10:32 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 7/18/12 8:56 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
I'm looking to do make some changes to ATS in addition to doing some
work on a plugin, and generally have a preference to to have unit
tests for most of the stuff I write.
On 7/18/12 10:32 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 7/18/12 8:56 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
I'm looking to do make some changes to ATS in addition to doing some work
on a plugin, and generally have a preference to to have unit tests for most
of the stuff I write. I figured I'd first look into what testin
On 7/18/12 9:37 AM, Alan M. Carroll wrote:
I think the best option is to move the burden to the backport proposer. While
backports serve a critical function there's good reason to make it a bit of a
challenge to keep them down to the ones that are really needed. Therefore we
could make the pro
On 7/18/12 8:56 AM, Adam Phelps wrote:
I'm looking to do make some changes to ATS in addition to doing some
work on a plugin, and generally have a preference to to have unit
tests for most of the stuff I write. I figured I'd first look into
what testing was already in the ATS code base, and se
I think the best option is to move the burden to the backport proposer. While
backports serve a critical function there's good reason to make it a bit of a
challenge to keep them down to the ones that are really needed. Therefore we
could make the proposer responsible for (1) detecting a +3 vote
I'm looking to do make some changes to ATS in addition to doing some work on a
plugin, and generally have a preference to to have unit tests for most of the
stuff I write. I figured I'd first look into what testing was already in the
ATS code base, and see a decent number of tests. However it
12 matches
Mail list logo
