sorry. it was not about traffic server. it's about virtual machine.
I performed same test on a real machine and there was no memory leak.
thanks.
-Original Message-
From: 오재경 [mailto:genex...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:48 PM
To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: so
On 6/20/12 5:46 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On 6/19/12 2:51 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
Core was generated by `/usr/bin/traffic_server -M -A,7:X,8:X6'.
Jan-Frode, did you file a Jira ticket for this? If not, can you please do
so, target it for v3.0.6, so we can get this resolved. Plenty of pe
On 6/19/12 2:51 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
Core was generated by `/usr/bin/traffic_server -M -A,7:X,8:X6'.
Jan-Frode, did you file a Jira ticket for this? If not, can you please do
so, target it for v3.0.6, so we can get this resolved. Plenty of people
seeing this problem I think.
Tack!
Apache Traffic Server v3.2.0 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Traffic Server project are
pleased to announce the release of Apache Traffic Server v3.2.0. This is our
latest stable release, and is immediately available from
http://trafficserver.apache.org/d
On 6/20/12 3:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi all,
In servlet 3.1 we have to support assync io and upgrade to raw buffering,
would that work with traffic server.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
I'm not familiar with servlet, doing some Bing'ing, it seems to be a Java
spec, JSR 340? Is that it?
Hi all,
In servlet 3.1 we have to support assync io and upgrade to raw
buffering, would that work with traffic server.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
