Interesting. Maybe there is a bug in the overflow code. 1/2 is
significant. Is the hot set stable or does it change? Do you fit the
working set? Clubs has more overhead but should be more robust (sans
bugs).
On Apr 27, 2012 4:10 PM, "Bryan Call" wrote:
> I wanted to know if anyone else has d
I would have expected LRU to perform better than that. :-(
-Jason
On Apr 27, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Bryan Call wrote:
> I wanted to know if anyone else has done testing on comparing how clfus and
> lru perform for real world traffic.
>
> I noticed that a server using clfus and didn't have the cach
I wanted to know if anyone else has done testing on comparing how clfus and lru
perform for real world traffic.
I noticed that a server using clfus and didn't have the cache filled was
getting a higher ram cache hit rate then a server that had the cache full.
That lead me to do a test with lru
we are using it, http://www.powerhttp.com/
Regards, Otto
Op 23 maart 2012 04:50 schreef Leif Hedstrom het
volgende:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like for us to make a page with a list of who's using Apache Traffic
> Server. It won't have to include any details, even something simple as just
> showing the l
Hi, guys, We (taobao.com) did some analysis (include the hotpot and
concurrency)by using the intel vtune_amplifier_xe with the help of an intel
engineer. Here comes the results. It seems that the copy_user_generic_string
and ink_freelist operation is the hotpot.
[cid:1335549173.21367.1.came
the attachment is the results for the mail server not support image.
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 02:02 +0800, taorui wrote:
> Hi, guys, We (taobao.com) did some analysis (include the hotpot and
> concurrency)by using the intel vtune_amplifier_xe with the help of an
> intel engineer. Here comes the resul
Hi, guys, We (taobao.com) did some analysis (include the hotpot and
concurrency)by using the intel vtune_amplifier_xe with the help of an
intel engineer. Here comes the results. It seems that the
copy_user_generic_string and ink_freelist operation is the hotpot.
On 4/27/12 7:34 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi all,
James suggested a while ago that we change how we deal with
backported bugs.
I agree with him that our system of closing, reopening, reassigning
etc. is
not only complicated, but difficult to follow.
His suggestion was
On Apr 27, 2012, at 6:34 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> Hi all,
>>
>> James suggested a while ago that we change how we deal with
>> backported bugs.
>> I agree with him that our system of closing, reopening, reassigning
>> etc. is
>> not only complicated, but diffi
- Original Message -
> Hi all,
>
> James suggested a while ago that we change how we deal with
> backported bugs.
> I agree with him that our system of closing, reopening, reassigning
> etc. is
> not only complicated, but difficult to follow.
>
> His suggestion was simply to clone a bug t
10 matches
Mail list logo