Re: Vol <-> CPU hash mapping, good or bad idea?

2011-12-05 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 12/5/11 8:24 PM, ming@gmail.com wrote: we know that Vol locking is the most expensive lock in cache layer, will we bind Vol and CPU(or thread) a good idea? But then you have to migrate the connections across threads all the time :-/. That's probably more expensive, because blowing L1/

Vol <-> CPU hash mapping, good or bad idea?

2011-12-05 Thread ming....@gmail.com
we know that Vol locking is the most expensive lock in cache layer, will we bind Vol and CPU(or thread) a good idea? -- zym, Zhao Yongming. aka: yonghao @ taobao.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Traffic Server v3.0.2

2011-12-05 Thread ming....@gmail.com
+1 tested on Gentoo x86_64, checksum ok. 在 2011-12-04日的 22:28 +,Igor Galić写道: > Hi folks, > > I've prepared a package for a v3.0.2 release. Please take a look at the > artifacts, check the STATUS/README/CHANGES files, and do builds and tests. > After finishing your examination of the relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Traffic Server v3.0.2

2011-12-05 Thread Mladen Turk
On 12/04/2011 11:28 PM, Igor Galić wrote: Hi folks, This is primarily a bug fix release, but we also include a couple of new features w.r.t. to SSL. For a full listing, see: +1 Builds cleanly on RHEL6 Signature OK Passes my set of tests. Regards -- ^TM

Re: [VOTE] Release Traffic Server v3.0.2

2011-12-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
Tested Fed14, CentOS6, OSX... +1 On Dec 4, 2011, at 5:28 PM, Igor Galić wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've prepared a package for a v3.0.2 release. Please take a look at the > artifacts, check the STATUS/README/CHANGES files, and do builds and tests. > After finishing your examination of the release c