Git +1
-Jason
On Nov 25, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 11/25/11 3:40 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>> I was +-0 there, and the same here. Not against it, but neither would I want
>> to be pushed by the more belligerent elements of the peanut gallery. It's
>> only a tool! IMHO an importan
On 11/25/11 3:40 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
I was +-0 there, and the same here. Not against it, but neither would I
want to be pushed by the more belligerent elements of the peanut gallery.
It's only a tool! IMHO an important consideration is to work within what
infra@ is ready for, and comfortable wi
I am for git. It is more flexible and faster.
On Nov 25, 2011 12:15 PM, "Leif Hedstrom" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There has been a sometimes heated discussion at the ASF over Git vs
> Subversion. I'm not going to reiterate all that here. However, I'd like for
> us to start a discussion whether we wan
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:14:53 -0700
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There has been a sometimes heated discussion at the ASF over Git vs
> Subversion. I'm not going to reiterate all that here. However, I'd like for
> us to start a discussion whether we want to migrate to Git, or stay with
>
git would make the work I do easier. SVN is in no way a showstopper, but having
multiple remotely accessible local branches would make it easier for me to vet
ideas and implementations before proposing them back to the community.
--
Theo Schlossnagle (mobile)
http://omniti.com/is/theo-schlossnag
Hi all,
There has been a sometimes heated discussion at the ASF over Git vs Subversion.
I'm not going to reiterate all that here. However, I'd like for us to start a
discussion whether we want to migrate to Git, or stay with Subversion. Infraops
are looking for more volunteers to participate in
