Re: ink_* -> ats_* in the "core" code

2011-09-02 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On Sep 2, 2011, at 6:56 PM, John Plevyak wrote: > Sorry to chime in on this so late. > > If the APIs were not already TSXXX I would have preferred to make the > external ones ats_ > and the internal ts_, but now that we are already down the path I agree with > Leif that we should > change all th

Re: ink_* -> ats_* in the "core" code

2011-09-02 Thread John Plevyak
Sorry to chime in on this so late. If the APIs were not already TSXXX I would have preferred to make the external ones ats_ and the internal ts_, but now that we are already down the path I agree with Leif that we should change all the internal apis to ats_. The downside is that* ink_ *can be don