Re: Should we make Posix Capabilities "required" ?

2011-07-16 Thread Igor Galić
> [1] http://www.trustedbsd.org/privileges.html As I already mentioned, the way to go for FreeBSD will probably turn out to be capsicum. But that is of no concern right now. (Only with 9.0) Unices do not support thread-based UIDs or privileges. (IIRC Windows does, but again, that is of no conce

Re: Should we make Posix Capabilities "required" ?

2011-07-16 Thread Alan M. Carroll
According to what I found[1] this project is current inoperative and it's unclear when (if ever) it will be available on FreeBSD. Personally, I think the better option is for me to fix the libcap related problems so it's not required. It's a bit ugly but not all that difficult. Now that I have

Re: Should we make Posix Capabilities "required" ?

2011-07-16 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/secure-chroot.html#AEN1514 > > > > > 3.5.2POSIX®.1e Process Capabilities > > > > POSIX® has released a working draft that adds event auditing, > > access > > control lists, fine grained privile

Re: Should we make Posix Capabilities "required" ?

2011-07-16 Thread Dossy Shiobara
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/secure-chroot.html#AEN1514 3.5.2POSIX®.1e Process Capabilities POSIX® has released a working draft that adds event auditing, access control lists, fine grained privileges, information labeling, and mandatory access cont

Re: Should we make Posix Capabilities "required" ?

2011-07-16 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > On platforms that provides this feature, should we make it mandatory > for > v3.2 ("trunk")? I think it'd simplify things, and avoid bug reports / > problems related to it. Granted, we still have to clean up our code That's two platforms right now: Solaris and Linu

Re: traffic_logstats

2011-07-16 Thread Alan D . Cabrera
On Jul 16, 2011, at 8:57 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> >> On Jul 16, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Igor Galić wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - I'm trying to get statistics from my traffic server much in the same was as was shown in >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server v3.0.1

2011-07-16 Thread alvin
+1 : RHEL 5.6 production box, been running for 15 hours, no more Seg Faults so far. Powered by Telkomsel BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: Bryan Call Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 10:14:55 To: us...@trafficserver.apache.org Reply-To: us...@trafficserver.apache.org Cc: dev@trafficserver.apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server v3.0.1

2011-07-16 Thread Bryan Call
+1: FC15 x86_64 built, passed regression, and using as my home forward proxy. -Bryan On Jul 15, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > On 07/15/2011 05:12 PM, Igor Galić wrote: >> Thanks to Bryan for pointing this out the blindingly obvious number >> >> I fixed that and rolled the tag. >> htt

Should we make Posix Capabilities "required" ?

2011-07-16 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On platforms that provides this feature, should we make it mandatory for v3.2 ("trunk")? I think it'd simplify things, and avoid bug reports / problems related to it. Granted, we still have to clean up our code mess here (with duplicated code in 2-3 places), but keeping libcap optional has litt

Re: traffic_logstats

2011-07-16 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > > On Jul 16, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > > > > > > > - Original Message - > >> I'm trying to get statistics from my traffic server much in the > >> same > >> was as was shown in > >> > >> http://www.ogre.com/node/357 > >> > >> But when I run > >> >

Re: traffic_logstats

2011-07-16 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Jul 16, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> I'm trying to get statistics from my traffic server much in the same >> was as was shown in >> >> http://www.ogre.com/node/357 >> >> But when I run >> >> [daruma:trafficserver 592]$ ./bin/traffic_logstats -

Re: traffic_logstats

2011-07-16 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > I'm trying to get statistics from my traffic server much in the same > was as was shown in > > http://www.ogre.com/node/357 > > But when I run > > [daruma:trafficserver 592]$ ./bin/traffic_logstats -h > Usage: traffic_logstats [-l logfile] [-o origin[,...]] [-O > o

traffic_logstats

2011-07-16 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
I'm trying to get statistics from my traffic server much in the same was as was shown in http://www.ogre.com/node/357 But when I run [daruma:trafficserver 592]$ ./bin/traffic_logstats -h Usage: traffic_logstats [-l logfile] [-o origin[,...]] [-O originfile] [-m minhits] [-inshv] switch

Re: Error when starting 3.0.0 on Mac OS X

2011-07-16 Thread ming....@gmail.com
this is the problem of cluster communication interface, it should be set to the existing real interface or loopback interface, change records.config to: CONFIG proxy.config.cluster.ethernet_interface STRING lo0 this case often rise up when you install a binary package, and where the default real i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Server v3.0.1

2011-07-16 Thread Igor Galić
+1 from me: checksums fit, compiles and passes regression tests on Ubuntu, 64 bit after minor config change: proxy.config.hostdb.size -> 20 -> 12 this update from 2.1.9(?) runs perfectly fine in test: http://blag.esotericsystems.at/ next up will be prod cheers - Original Message -